We have a current BT Net fibre dedicated line. A few months ago, a worker "put a shovel through the cable" and we lost the service for a few days.
The boss ordered the Failover product from BT to avoid this scenario in future. The selling point being that the equipment would sense the interruption and seemlessly switch to a different feed, through a fibre cable that takes a different route.
We've been told that they're coming tomorrow to get the fibre into the building and that we can expect a second Cisco 4321 router. We currently have an ADVA FSP 150 to terminate the current fibre cable which feeds to a Cisco 4321. We plug our firewall into the Cisco.
Does anyone know if this second Cisco router is neccessary for the Failover service or has someone at BT made a mistake?
I would've thought that the intelligence and capability to switch between the two feeds would all happen inside the ADVA.
Apart from anything else, we don't have room in the network cabinet for a second Cisco 4321.
Thanks.
Luca



Pages in this thread:
Print Thread
