General Discussion
  >> Fibre Broadband


Register (or login) on our website and you will not see this ad.


Pages in this thread: 1 | 2 | >> (show all)   Print Thread
Standard User lucavigg
(newbie) Thu 11-May-23 09:58:40
Print Post

BT NET Fibre Failover


[link to this post]
 
We have a current BT Net fibre dedicated line. A few months ago, a worker "put a shovel through the cable" and we lost the service for a few days.

The boss ordered the Failover product from BT to avoid this scenario in future. The selling point being that the equipment would sense the interruption and seemlessly switch to a different feed, through a fibre cable that takes a different route.

We've been told that they're coming tomorrow to get the fibre into the building and that we can expect a second Cisco 4321 router. We currently have an ADVA FSP 150 to terminate the current fibre cable which feeds to a Cisco 4321. We plug our firewall into the Cisco.

Does anyone know if this second Cisco router is neccessary for the Failover service or has someone at BT made a mistake?

I would've thought that the intelligence and capability to switch between the two feeds would all happen inside the ADVA.

Apart from anything else, we don't have room in the network cabinet for a second Cisco 4321.

Thanks.
Luca
Standard User Whitehall11
(member) Thu 11-May-23 10:56:34
Print Post

Re: BT NET Fibre Failover


[re: lucavigg] [link to this post]
 
BT NET SLA's are pretty tight from memory so unless you're some big old data centre, sounds a bit overkill to use a redundancy fibre line. I thought BT Business did 4G backup now for most of their customers?
Standard User john_32
(learned) Thu 11-May-23 11:16:50
Print Post

Re: BT NET Fibre Failover


[re: lucavigg] [link to this post]
 
From my experience dual routers are installed on premise that do some clever stuff to enable the public IP to be delivered via either circuit

This document may help explain the options

https://business.bt.com/assets/pdf/broadband-and-int...

John

Edited by john_32 (Thu 11-May-23 11:17:08)


Register (or login) on our website and you will not see this ad.

Standard User candlerb
(knowledge is power) Thu 11-May-23 11:33:00
Print Post

Re: BT NET Fibre Failover


[re: lucavigg] [link to this post]
 
In reply to a post by lucavigg:
Does anyone know if this second Cisco router is neccessary for the Failover service

Yes, it is for full redundancy - you should expect to get a second ADVA as well. Then if either of the ADVAs or Ciscos fail, your connectivity will continue.

You'll have to pay for the power to all 4 devices, of course.

This approach makes sense for a data centre. For an office, you might be better off with 5G backup - or some service which is unlikely to share much infrastructure with your BT leased line, such as a Virgin Media circuit.
Standard User danielhyde
(committed) Thu 11-May-23 11:33:24
Print Post

Re: BT NET Fibre Failover


[re: john_32] [link to this post]
 
Yeah they will be using HSRP or something similar.
The local routers WAN Port will need to to go to a switch then both cisco routers will connect to this,
The local router will then use an IP that is shared by both devices as its default gateway.
The primary router/connection will have this IP, if this falls over it will transfer to the backup router/connection.

Thanks
Dan
Standard User Pheasant
(knowledge is power) Thu 11-May-23 14:34:12
Print Post

Re: BT NET Fibre Failover


[re: lucavigg] [link to this post]
 
In reply to a post by lucavigg:
….sense the interruption and seemlessly switch to a different feed, through a fibre cable that takes a different route.

There will still be single points of failure, especially if someone puts a digger bucket somewhere they shouldn’t.

If you’re going to all this trouble and expense - you really want diverse fibre from different PoPs / exchanges and taking a completely diverse route, including a different entry point to the premises / property.

Otherwise an exchange level fault could see you out of action or a digger on your doorstep could in theory take out both ‘diverse’ fibres if they’re using the same footway chamber / entry conduit for example.

Similarly if your own equipment has single points of failure then you could be spending money needlessly. It’s all about ID’ing the most likely points of failure and their consequences.

@candlerb’s comment above about a different method of connection - 5G or similar has a lot of merit.
Standard User lucavigg
(newbie) Thu 11-May-23 14:46:16
Print Post

Re: BT NET Fibre Failover


[re: john_32] [link to this post]
 
Thanks for that. I'll take a look.
Standard User jpm
(fountain of knowledge) Thu 11-May-23 14:47:04
Print Post

Re: BT NET Fibre Failover


[re: Pheasant] [link to this post]
 
If what BT are providing is an RO2 service then there will be full fibre path diversity and the circuits will terminate in different exchanges. I agree that there are usually better ways to spend money than trying to add uptime by purchasing more fibres though.

Edited by jpm (Thu 11-May-23 14:48:13)

Standard User lucavigg
(newbie) Thu 11-May-23 14:54:25
Print Post

Re: BT NET Fibre Failover


[re: candlerb] [link to this post]
 
Oh, this is very bad news. We definitely haven't got room for a second ADVA and we're tight on places to put a second cabinet.

Unfortunately, the boss was persuaded and signed on the dotted line before I got involved. Seems somewhat overkill, as others have said.

I can sort of understand his concern. He runs a high turnover food distribution business. Attended operations are from midnight until 4PM the next day. The bulk of the orders from buying consortia, large hotels and restaurant chains come in between 4PM and midnight, when no one is on the premises.

I think he latched onto the idea that it would be a seemless failover if something were to go wrong. It's just a shame he didn't mull over his options some more before committing.

Edited by lucavigg (Thu 11-May-23 14:56:33)

Standard User jpm
(fountain of knowledge) Thu 11-May-23 15:34:46
Print Post

Re: BT NET Fibre Failover


[re: lucavigg] [link to this post]
 
The ADVA NTEs can be wall mounted if you are tight on space
Standard User lucavigg
(newbie) Thu 11-May-23 16:07:56
Print Post

Re: BT NET Fibre Failover


[re: jpm] [link to this post]
 
Understood. Thanks.
Standard User Iniltous
(regular) Fri 12-May-23 17:24:14
Print Post

Re: BT NET Fibre Failover


[re: lucavigg] [link to this post]
 
As already stated , this is likely to be a RO2 ( resilient option 2 ) the resilient ‘ fibre’ should maintain a minimum separation distance from the existing service, often originating in a different exchange to the existing fibre service , typically, if the original fibre enters at the south side of the building the resilient fibre enters from the north side , thereby avoiding a total loss of service should someone with a digger excavate through the primary fibre cable , if there are any pinch points , where the separate fibres physically get close to each other , this is usually within the customer’s building, (if there were only one cable route into the comms room for example ) , the customer is made aware of any pinch point and they either accept it or spend even more money to maintain separation, obviously some pinch points are ( in practice ) unavoidable, but carry very small risk of a single incident damaging both circuits and unless a second comms room exists for the RO2 service , eventually the resilient equipment will be in the same room as the original service anyway .

There is an RO1 option, this uses the second network port of the existing Adva NTE , the fibre routing resilience is the same as RO2 , but obviously if the NTE itself failed , then the service would be down irrespective of a resilient route existing , hence why most businesses that want a resilient option , go for RO2, not RO1 , as for the relatively small difference in price , its as close to 100% resilience as possible , and if resilience is deemed essential, most people would go for the maximum practical resilience available.

Edited by Iniltous (Fri 12-May-23 17:34:15)

Standard User candlerb
(knowledge is power) Fri 12-May-23 18:40:19
Print Post

Re: BT NET Fibre Failover


[re: lucavigg] [link to this post]
 
In reply to a post by lucavigg:
I can sort of understand his concern. He runs a high turnover food distribution business. Attended operations are from midnight until 4PM the next day. The bulk of the orders from buying consortia, large hotels and restaurant chains come in between 4PM and midnight, when no one is on the premises.

I would have suggested hosting the order handling system in a proper data centre, where redundant connectivity is cheap and there's good backup power. Or of course, there's "the cloud", which is basically the same thing but charged by the hour.

Shoving business-critical servers into a single cabinet in an overcrowded closet is asking for trouble. What's the plan if one of those servers dies?

I realise I'm preaching to the converted, and there's not much you can do if the boss went ahead without talking to you smile
Standard User lucavigg
(newbie) Sat 13-May-23 05:37:18
Print Post

Re: BT NET Fibre Failover


[re: Iniltous] [link to this post]
 
If BT had told us this info at the time, I’m fairly certain we would’ve gone for RO1. There is a pinch point about 20 feet from the premises but a new ADVA turned up on Friday and was installed.
Standard User lucavigg
(newbie) Sat 13-May-23 05:51:36
Print Post

Re: BT NET Fibre Failover


[re: candlerb] [link to this post]
 
In reply to a post by candlerb:
I realise I'm preaching to the converted, and there's not much you can do if the boss went ahead without talking to you smile


We’re still in the dark ages as far as the ordering system and server is concerned. The thing that got him really spooked is two recent outages of his Voip system. Most orders come in by direct voice, voicemail backed up by email or email directly. Most buying consortia will email notification of a new order and rely on the supplier to login to their systems to do the rest.
Restaurant chains, football catering and golf clubs still phone their orders in. It’s quite surprising how manual the process still is.

I think if I had interrogated BT and found out exactly what we were getting, I would’ve suggested the 5G option but, as I said he got spooked and signed on the dotted line pretty swiftly.
Standard User Pheasant
(knowledge is power) Sat 13-May-23 06:15:53
Print Post

Re: BT NET Fibre Failover


[re: lucavigg] [link to this post]
 
Good luck with it all. Sounds like someone should sit down with the boss and do a proper risk review of your entire IT infrastructure and systems - before he knee jerk signs another contract that probably won’t have any bearing on making his business more resilient.
Standard User AndyPandy
(fountain of knowledge) Sat 13-May-23 16:05:53
Print Post

Re: BT NET Fibre Failover


[re: Pheasant] [link to this post]
 
This is the right answer.

We had BT NET fibre as the primary, and Virgin fibre as the backup where I worked.


Hey!Broadband 1Gb Fibre - Live BQM
Asus AC86U - Asuswrt Merlin
Standard User jpm
(fountain of knowledge) Sat 13-May-23 16:11:58
Print Post

Re: BT NET Fibre Failover


[re: lucavigg] [link to this post]
 
I've never seen an ISP actually offer RO1
Pages in this thread: 1 | 2 | >> (show all)   Print Thread

Jump to