As already stated , this is likely to be a RO2 ( resilient option 2 ) the resilient ‘ fibre’ should maintain a minimum separation distance from the existing service, often originating in a different exchange to the existing fibre service , typically, if the original fibre enters at the south side of the building the resilient fibre enters from the north side , thereby avoiding a total loss of service should someone with a digger excavate through the primary fibre cable , if there are any pinch points , where the separate fibres physically get close to each other , this is usually within the customer’s building, (if there were only one cable route into the comms room for example ) , the customer is made aware of any pinch point and they either accept it or spend even more money to maintain separation, obviously some pinch points are ( in practice ) unavoidable, but carry very small risk of a single incident damaging both circuits and unless a second comms room exists for the RO2 service , eventually the resilient equipment will be in the same room as the original service anyway .
There is an RO1 option, this uses the second network port of the existing Adva NTE , the fibre routing resilience is the same as RO2 , but obviously if the NTE itself failed , then the service would be down irrespective of a resilient route existing , hence why most businesses that want a resilient option , go for RO2, not RO1 , as for the relatively small difference in price , its as close to 100% resilience as possible , and if resilience is deemed essential, most people would go for the maximum practical resilience available.
Edited by Iniltous (Fri 12-May-23 17:34:15)