General Discussion
  >> Fibre Broadband


Register (or login) on our website and you will not see this ad.


Pages in this thread: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | [6] | 7 | 8 | 9 | (show all)   Print Thread
Standard User deleted
(deleted) Mon 09-Jan-12 19:20:10
Print Post

Re: websites slow - 100% packet loss.


[re: deleted] [link to this post]
 
In reply to a post by trogoy:
Also why do I have a rediculously high ping which is over 200ms in the middle of my results?
That could be due to something happening on your LAN which causes the ping spike.
Standard User deleted
(deleted) Mon 09-Jan-12 19:47:42
Print Post

Re: websites slow - 100% packet loss.


[re: deleted] [link to this post]
 
is that the lan1 on my modem?
Standard User Zarjaz
(knowledge is power) Mon 09-Jan-12 20:01:00
Print Post

Re: websites slow - 100% packet loss.


[re: deleted] [link to this post]
 
No he means something/activity on your LAN (local area network) the bit between you and the router.


Register (or login) on our website and you will not see this ad.

Standard User deleted
(deleted) Mon 09-Jan-12 20:12:13
Print Post

Re: websites slow - 100% packet loss.


[re: Zarjaz] [link to this post]
 
Is there anything I can do about this?
Administrator MrSaffron
(staff) Mon 09-Jan-12 21:58:51
Print Post

Re: websites slow - 100% packet loss.


[re: deleted] [link to this post]
 
No, and no reason to do so, a blip of 200ms in a single packet is nothing to be concerned about with respect to your 3 to 10 second delay in webpages open

Andrew Ferguson, [email protected]
www.thinkbroadband.com - formerly known as ADSLguide.org.uk
The author of the above post is a thinkbroadband staff member. It may not constitute an official statement on behalf of thinkbroadband.
Standard User deleted
(deleted) Mon 09-Jan-12 22:02:59
Print Post

Re: websites slow - 100% packet loss.


[re: MrSaffron] [link to this post]
 
I wonder if the DNS caches have been flushed?
Administrator MrSaffron
(staff) Mon 09-Jan-12 22:05:28
Print Post

Re: websites slow - 100% packet loss.


[re: deleted] [link to this post]
 
would not improve ping times, but might improve initial name resolution to flush DNS from a command prompt

ipconfig /flushdns

Andrew Ferguson, [email protected]
www.thinkbroadband.com - formerly known as ADSLguide.org.uk
The author of the above post is a thinkbroadband staff member. It may not constitute an official statement on behalf of thinkbroadband.
Standard User deleted
(deleted) Mon 09-Jan-12 22:44:53
Print Post

Re: websites slow - 100% packet loss.


[re: deleted] [link to this post]
 
DNS caches flushed. Is something i could do or bt/openreach?
Standard User deleted
(deleted) Mon 09-Jan-12 22:46:05
Print Post

Re: websites slow - 100% packet loss.


[re: MrSaffron] [link to this post]
 
how come i always get a spike llike this but everyone who posted their ping tests in that other post were all below 25ms on all 50 points?
Standard User dieselglider
(experienced) Tue 10-Jan-12 07:27:26
Print Post

Re: websites slow - 100% packet loss.


[re: deleted] [link to this post]
 
Pinging 81.19.219.81 with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 81.19.219.81: bytes=32 time=27ms TTL=117
Reply from 81.19.219.81: bytes=32 time=27ms TTL=117
Reply from 81.19.219.81: bytes=32 time=27ms TTL=117
Reply from 81.19.219.81: bytes=32 time=27ms TTL=117
Reply from 81.19.219.81: bytes=32 time=26ms TTL=117
Reply from 81.19.219.81: bytes=32 time=27ms TTL=117
Reply from 81.19.219.81: bytes=32 time=27ms TTL=117
Reply from 81.19.219.81: bytes=32 time=27ms TTL=117
Reply from 81.19.219.81: bytes=32 time=27ms TTL=117
Reply from 81.19.219.81: bytes=32 time=27ms TTL=117
Reply from 81.19.219.81: bytes=32 time=27ms TTL=117
Reply from 81.19.219.81: bytes=32 time=26ms TTL=117
Reply from 81.19.219.81: bytes=32 time=26ms TTL=117
Reply from 81.19.219.81: bytes=32 time=27ms TTL=117
Reply from 81.19.219.81: bytes=32 time=27ms TTL=117
Reply from 81.19.219.81: bytes=32 time=61ms TTL=117
Reply from 81.19.219.81: bytes=32 time=28ms TTL=117
Reply from 81.19.219.81: bytes=32 time=29ms TTL=117
Reply from 81.19.219.81: bytes=32 time=27ms TTL=117
Reply from 81.19.219.81: bytes=32 time=27ms TTL=117

Ping statistics for 81.19.219.81:
Packets: Sent = 20, Received = 20, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 26ms, Maximum = 61ms, Average = 28ms

Pinging 81.19.219.81 with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 81.19.219.81: bytes=32 time=28ms TTL=117
Reply from 81.19.219.81: bytes=32 time=26ms TTL=117
Reply from 81.19.219.81: bytes=32 time=26ms TTL=117
Reply from 81.19.219.81: bytes=32 time=27ms TTL=117
Reply from 81.19.219.81: bytes=32 time=27ms TTL=117
Reply from 81.19.219.81: bytes=32 time=27ms TTL=117
Reply from 81.19.219.81: bytes=32 time=27ms TTL=117
Reply from 81.19.219.81: bytes=32 time=27ms TTL=117
Reply from 81.19.219.81: bytes=32 time=27ms TTL=117
Reply from 81.19.219.81: bytes=32 time=27ms TTL=117
Reply from 81.19.219.81: bytes=32 time=27ms TTL=117
Reply from 81.19.219.81: bytes=32 time=92ms TTL=117
Reply from 81.19.219.81: bytes=32 time=61ms TTL=117
Reply from 81.19.219.81: bytes=32 time=30ms TTL=117
Reply from 81.19.219.81: bytes=32 time=26ms TTL=117
Reply from 81.19.219.81: bytes=32 time=27ms TTL=117
Reply from 81.19.219.81: bytes=32 time=26ms TTL=117
Reply from 81.19.219.81: bytes=32 time=27ms TTL=117
Reply from 81.19.219.81: bytes=32 time=26ms TTL=117
Reply from 81.19.219.81: bytes=32 time=30ms TTL=117

Ping statistics for 81.19.219.81:
Packets: Sent = 20, Received = 20, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 26ms, Maximum = 92ms, Average = 32ms

Does this make you feel a little better? I did a 50 ping test yesterday which didn't show any increase blip in the middle. This is from N.Ireland east coast, as someone else asked, where is your location?

BTInfinity
Pages in this thread: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | [6] | 7 | 8 | 9 | (show all)   Print Thread

Jump to