I wish i could have got near half of your current speed for 6 years, i fact 1/8 of it for 4 years, prior to that costing a fortune on dial up to 2005 as adsl wasnt available to me without a severe push to BT, think yourself lucky. Probably paying same price to, now tell me its a lottery.
Balls on the other foot now.
Speedtest.net tells me that 52% of the UK population has a faster connection than me. So I'm fully aware that I'm better off than many people. I was actually thinking more about those people who still have sub megabit connections when I wrote my post. As mentioned on other forums the real world impact of going from your speed to FTTC speeds should be lifestyle altering. For me it will mean peak bandwidth per person in my home would increase 10x which would make a difference to my online behaviour.
Is isn't a lottery. And there is something you can do about
The lottery part of my statement applies in many ways. Distance from cab for FTTC, distance from exchange for ADSL, OR going with FTTP instead of FTTC, RF interference killing bandwidth, proximity to a 3G mast for wireless access, the list goes on...
Also not everyone has the flexibility to move where the Internet access is better. I moved to my current home 6 years back when Fibre was nowhere. As you say when I next move it will be up there in my list of requirements!
Edited by deleted (Sat 04-Feb-12 11:45:00)