|
|
So bob ALL the local authorities have completed open market review and public consultation phases?
|
|
The author of the above post is a thinkbroadband staff member. It may not constitute an official statement on behalf of thinkbroadband.
|
|
|
The position with regard to BDUK seems to be they have taken a particular date as to determine whether and exchange or cabinet is commercially viable or not.
My understanding there is provision for BDUK funding clawback when exchanges become commercially viable or cabinets become commercially viable as many will at some time in the future.
How exactly Bob do you plan on BDUK clawing funding back from Openreach when they don't know how much a cabinet / exchange cost to enable in the first place nor the algorithms Openreach use to calculate viability?
|
|
|
Rope dangling is always worth a go if you might benefit
|
|
The author of the above post is a thinkbroadband staff member. It may not constitute an official statement on behalf of thinkbroadband.
|
|
Register (or login) on our website and you will not see this ad.
|
|
|
Rope dangling is always worth a go if you might benefit
There is a potential upside and no downside. If I'm completely wrong and shown to be an idiot it's fine, you get used to it after a while
|
|
|
By this stage a cabint is either Commercially viable or within the BDUK sheme. Who ever is running the BDUK scheme should be able to tell you if you are in the assited scheme or not. THey usually go by house number and post ode rather than by cabinet
Nope.
Covering this area speciically is this.
Do read the note on the cover about things being subject to change. It's not in or out until the procurement is complete.
|
|
|
|
As far as I know yes as if they have not they would be to late for BDUK funding as that information is need to obtain the funding otherwise they are signing a blank cheque
|
|
|
http://www.thinkbroadband.com/news/5555-warwickshire...
So how come Warwickshire and others are still in the Public Consultation Phase which comes after the market review?
|
|
The author of the above post is a thinkbroadband staff member. It may not constitute an official statement on behalf of thinkbroadband.
|
|
|
|
They would have that information but they will not make it public as it is confidential information and not for disclosure
|
|
|
|
He would be wasting his time with FOI this would be commercislly confidential information and would not be disclosed even if he made an FOI application as it is excempt
|
|
|
|
THey may be still in the Public Consoltation phase but they would have done the gap anaylisis. The poster was specificaly referring to Leeds and they have definatly carried it out and the link the postter gave identifies the totall number of premises not in the BT commercial rollout
|