No moving towards, wires only is here with Sky etc providing their own hardware for FTTC.

In reply to a post by MrSaffron:

No moving towards, wires only is here with Sky etc providing their own hardware for FTTC.

Perhaps I should have said "as we move to wires only for all FTTC products from all ISPs

Edited by deleted (Thu 14-Aug-14 13:35:06)

In reply to a post by systemx:

[As to ownership of the modem, page 31 para 7.6 "Cease of WBC FTTC" indicates that the active NTE (modem) should be returned to Openreach.
[/quote]And perhaps you should have read my reply more closely. I was rebutting your comment about the modem being the BT demarcation point, not whether the modem should be returned post cessation of FTTC service...

Paul

In reply to a post by systemx:

A handy link for FTTC stuff.

http://br0kent3l3ph0n3.files.wordpress.com/2012/11/b...

That was old one. For 40/2 & 40/10.

The new one is 80/20 here: https://www.btwholesale.com/shared/document/Products...

BT again .

Premise.
Premises.

In reply to a post by RobertoS:

BT again .

Premise.
Premises.

lol u tell them!

It's correct in the Openreach one - 506. The other one 509 quotes is 477, saying 509 is until 477 and 506 are updated by Openreach. 506 is still Feb 2013 and 477 has vanished .

In reply to a post by RobertoS:

BT again .

Premise.
Premises.

I just provided the quote guv. Still, could be worse, I could loose the will to live or get a screw lose...

Edited by ian72 (Thu 14-Aug-14 16:22:12)

I did say it was BT .

How about this, also from SIN 509. "The WBC FTTP product will consume and use Openreaches Generic Ethernet Access over FTTP (GEA FTTP) product".

In reply to a post by RobertoS:

How about this, also from SIN 509. "The WBC FTTP product will consume and use Openreaches Generic Ethernet Access over FTTP (GEA FTTP) product".

I think Openreaches is, strictly speaking, correct although the dictionaries would probably call it archaic.

In the more usual spelling of Openreach's the possessive apostrophe represents the omitted e.

I'm not so sure about consume� a byte at time, presumably

Edited by billford (Thu 14-Aug-14 19:03:42)