General Discussion
  >> Fibre Broadband


Register (or login) on our website and you will not see this ad.


Pages in this thread: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | [8] | 9 | (show all)   Print Thread
Standard User deleted
(deleted) Mon 30-Mar-15 15:04:54
Print Post

Re: G.INP or Interleaving?


[re: deleted] [link to this post]
 
Does the router need to be G.INP compatible? My HG612 seems to be G.INP enabled now but I prefer using my old 7800N over the 8800NL.

I know Billion routers have PhyR, does this need to be enabled? Is PhyR, vectoring and G.INP the same thing?
Standard User RobertoS
(elder) Mon 30-Mar-15 18:45:48
Print Post

Re: G.INP or Interleaving?


[re: deleted] [link to this post]
 
We could do with seeing the full stats, for the experts to assess the interleaving. As in

# xdslcmd info --show
xdslcmd: ADSL driver and PHY status
Status: Showtime
Retrain Reason: 0
Last initialization procedure status: 0
Max: Upstream rate = 16882 Kbps, Downstream rate = 58604 Kbps
Bearer: 0, Upstream rate = 16961 Kbps, Downstream rate = 60000 Kbps
Bearer: 1, Upstream rate = 0 Kbps, Downstream rate = 0 Kbps
Link Power State: L0
Mode: VDSL2 Annex B
VDSL2 Profile: Profile 17a
TPS-TC: PTM Mode(0x0)
Trellis: U:ON /D:ON
Line Status: No Defect
Training Status: Showtime
Down Up
SNR (dB): 5.8 5.8
Attn(dB): 19.6 0.0
Pwr(dBm): 13.6 7.5
VDSL2 framing
Bearer 0
MSGc: -6 -6
B: 178 227
M: 1 1
T: 0 0
R: 10 14
S: 0.0950 0.4276
L: 15922 4528
D: 16 4
I: 189 242
N: 189 242
Q: 16 4
V: 2 0
RxQueue: 33 27
TxQueue: 11 9
G.INP Framing: 18 18
G.INP lookback: 11 9
RRC bits: 24 24
Bearer 1
MSGc: 122 58
B: 0 0
M: 2 2
T: 2 2
R: 16 16
S: 8.0000 16.0000
L: 32 16
D: 1 1
I: 32 32
N: 32 32
Q: 0 0
V: 0 0
RxQueue: 0 0
TxQueue: 0 0
G.INP Framing: 0 0
G.INP lookback: 0 0
RRC bits: 0 0
Counters
Bearer 0
OHF: 0 0
OHFErr: 0 0
RS: 505927104 1144245
RSCorr: 6084 102
RSUnCorr: 0 0
Bearer 1
OHF: 750754 753697
OHFErr: 0 0
RS: 6005540 3014788
RSCorr: 0 3
RSUnCorr: 0 0

Retransmit Counters
rtx_tx: 3332 20
rtx_c: 57 252
rtx_uc: 0 0

G.INP Counters
LEFTRS: 0 31
minEFTR: 60009 16953
errFreeBits: 11034003 117174572

Bearer 0
HEC: 0 0
OCD: 0 0
LCD: 0 0
Total Cells: 1391368217 0
Data Cells: 2191833 0
Drop Cells: 0
Bit Errors: 0 0

Bearer 1
HEC: 0 0
OCD: 0 0
LCD: 0 0
Total Cells: 0 0
Data Cells: 0 0
Drop Cells: 0
Bit Errors: 0 0

ES: 0 0
SES: 0 0
UAS: 52 52
AS: 12059

Bearer 0
INP: 48.00 44.00
INPRein: 0.00 0.00
delay: 0 0
PER: 0.00 0.00
OR: 0.01 0.01
AgR: 60083.56 16997.80

Bearer 1
INP: 2.00 4.00
INPRein: 2.00 4.00
delay: 0 0
PER: 16.06 16.06
OR: 63.75 31.87
AgR: 63.75 31.87

Bitswap: 9233/9233 252/252


Mine has a small amount, but before it had very high interleaving levels.

My broadband basic info/help site - www.robertos.me.uk. Domains, site and mail hosting - Tsohost.
Connection - Plusnet UnLim Fibre (FTTC). Sync 60000/16961kbps @ 600m. - IPv4BQM IPv6BQM
Standard User mlmclaren
(experienced) Mon 30-Mar-15 19:04:43
Print Post

Re: G.INP or Interleaving?


[re: RobertoS] [link to this post]
 
When I was affected my Interleaving levels went very high and then when I flashed more recent firmware they dropped to low levels.

Actually my Interleaving & INP levels where very high but didn't actually match the levels at which they where showing.

Plusnet Unlimited 21CN 4200/800 @ 4.2Km > TP-Link TD-W8968v3 - BQM IPv4
Plusnet Fibre Extra 66000/20000 @ 450m > HG612 (Unlocked) > Linksys LRT224 - BQM IPv4


Register (or login) on our website and you will not see this ad.

Standard User deleted
(deleted) Mon 30-Mar-15 19:13:21
Print Post

Re: G.INP or Interleaving?


[re: mlmclaren] [link to this post]
 
xdslcmd info --stats
xdslcmd: ADSL driver and PHY status
Status: Showtime
Retrain Reason: 0
Last initialization procedure status: 0
Max: Upstream rate = 47890 Kbps, Downstream rate = 92308 Kbps
Bearer: 0, Upstream rate = 20000 Kbps, Downstream rate = 79999 Kbps
Bearer: 1, Upstream rate = 0 Kbps, Downstream rate = 0 Kbps
Link Power State: L0
Mode: VDSL2 Annex B
VDSL2 Profile: Profile 17a
TPS-TC: PTM Mode(0x0)
Trellis: U:ON /D:ON
Line Status: No Defect
Training Status: Showtime
Down Up
SNR (dB): 9.2 24.6
Attn(dB): 10.6 0.0
Pwr(dBm): 12.4 7.8
VDSL2 framing
Bearer 0
MSGc: -6 -6
B: 130 97
M: 1 1
T: 0 0
R: 8 8
S: 0.0518 0.1554
L: 21468 5457
D: 16 8
I: 139 106
N: 139 106
Q: 16 8
V: 14 2
RxQueue: 57 39
TxQueue: 19 13
G.INP Framing: 18 18
G.INP lookback: 19 13
RRC bits: 24 24
Bearer 1
MSGc: 186 58
B: 0 0
M: 2 2
T: 2 2
R: 16 16
S: 5.3333 16.0000
L: 48 16
D: 3 1
I: 32 32
N: 32 32
Q: 0 0
V: 0 0
RxQueue: 0 0
TxQueue: 0 0
G.INP Framing: 0 0
G.INP lookback: 0 0
RRC bits: 0 0
Counters
Bearer 0
OHF: 0 0
OHFErr: 0 0
RS: 2014920640 2108717
RSCorr: 7963 815
RSUnCorr: 0 0
Bearer 1
OHF: 15535252 916004
OHFErr: 0 0
RS: 186422288 2254731
RSCorr: 1 7
RSUnCorr: 0 0

Retransmit Counters
rtx_tx: 100346 107
rtx_c: 734 298
rtx_uc: 0 0

G.INP Counters
LEFTRS: 5 14
minEFTR: 79999 19997
errFreeBits: 304471920 102145351

Bearer 0
HEC: 0 0
OCD: 0 0
LCD: 0 0
Total Cells: 4029929309 0
Data Cells: 862077685 0
Drop Cells: 0
Bit Errors: 0 0

Bearer 1
HEC: 0 0
OCD: 0 0
LCD: 0 0
Total Cells: 0 0
Data Cells: 0 0
Drop Cells: 0
Bit Errors: 0 0

ES: 0 0
SES: 0 0
UAS: 318 318
AS: 249538

Bearer 0
INP: 46.00 47.00
INPRein: 0.00 0.00
delay: 0 0
PER: 0.00 0.00
OR: 0.01 0.01
AgR: 80614.82 20102.08

Bearer 1
INP: 4.00 4.00
INPRein: 4.00 4.00
delay: 3 0
PER: 16.06 16.06
OR: 95.62 31.87
AgR: 95.62 31.87

Bitswap: 159976/159976 369/369

Total time = 1 days 21 hours 24 min 16 sec
FEC: 7963 815
CRC: 0 0
ES: 0 0
SES: 0 0
UAS: 318 318
LOS: 0 0
LOF: 0 0
LOM: 0 0
Latest 15 minutes time = 9 min 16 sec
FEC: 0 0
CRC: 0 0
ES: 0 0
SES: 0 0
UAS: 0 0
LOS: 0 0
LOF: 0 0
LOM: 0 0
Previous 15 minutes time = 15 min 0 sec
FEC: 1 0
CRC: 0 0
ES: 0 0
SES: 0 0
UAS: 0 0
LOS: 0 0
LOF: 0 0
LOM: 0 0
Latest 1 day time = 21 hours 24 min 16 sec
FEC: 2337 249
CRC: 0 0
ES: 0 0
SES: 0 0
UAS: 0 0
LOS: 0 0
LOF: 0 0
LOM: 0 0
Previous 1 day time = 24 hours 0 sec
FEC: 3601 247
CRC: 0 0
ES: 0 0
SES: 0 0
UAS: 0 0
LOS: 0 0
LOF: 0 0
LOM: 0 0
Since Link time = 2 days 21 hours 18 min 57 sec
FEC: 7963 815
CRC: 0 0
ES: 0 0
SES: 0 0
UAS: 0 0
LOS: 0 0
LOF: 0 0
LOM: 0 0
#
Standard User RobertoS
(elder) Mon 30-Mar-15 20:02:47
Print Post

Re: G.INP or Interleaving?


[re: mlmclaren] [link to this post]
 
I already had the latest one running - the same as I just flashed into the new HG612. G.INP was not implemented - it was genuine heavy interleaving. I know what caused it smile. Somewhere a couple of weeks back I think I have a stats post showing it.

This all blew up when the G.INP went on. AIUI they got a connection from me straight afterwards, then it dropped and never came back.

My broadband basic info/help site - www.robertos.me.uk. Domains, site and mail hosting - Tsohost.
Connection - Plusnet UnLim Fibre (FTTC). Sync 60000/16961kbps @ 600m. - IPv4BQM IPv6BQM
Standard User mlmclaren
(experienced) Mon 30-Mar-15 20:04:31
Print Post

Re: G.INP or Interleaving?


[re: RobertoS] [link to this post]
 
Hmmm OK!

Plusnet Unlimited 21CN 4200/800 @ 4.2Km > TP-Link TD-W8968v3 - BQM IPv4
Plusnet Fibre Extra 66000/20000 @ 450m > HG612 (Unlocked) > Linksys LRT224 - BQM IPv4
Standard User RobertoS
(elder) Mon 30-Mar-15 20:13:24
Print Post

Re: G.INP or Interleaving?


[re: deleted] [link to this post]
 
Full sync in both directions, but a very odd 3ms delay on Bearer 1 downstream. Interleaving similar to mine but a different pattern for the matrix - a different type of setting altogether, though both are small.

Have to wait for the experts.

What is wrong with the upload speed? Is download OK? I can't test mine yet because of the Current line speed.

My broadband basic info/help site - www.robertos.me.uk. Domains, site and mail hosting - Tsohost.
Connection - Plusnet UnLim Fibre (FTTC). Sync 60000/16961kbps @ 600m. - IPv4BQM IPv6BQM
Standard User TiMeTraVeLeR
(member) Tue 31-Mar-15 09:15:15
Print Post

Re: G.INP or Interleaving?


[re: Zadeks] [link to this post]
 
My Hg612 went from 16ms to 32ms on the 21St of this month on an older unlocked FW.

I want to thank you guys for talking about this as I then proceed to update my FW to the latest and now my ping's are back to 16ms

Thanks fellas.
Standard User mlmclaren
(experienced) Tue 31-Mar-15 09:23:19
Print Post

Re: G.INP or Interleaving?


[re: TiMeTraVeLeR] [link to this post]
 
Thank you for your feedback, It is key to proving what the issue is and will contribute towards a wider fix for everybody smile

Plusnet Unlimited 21CN 4200/800 @ 4.2Km > TP-Link TD-W8968v3 - BQM IPv4
Plusnet Fibre Extra 66000/20000 @ 450m > HG612 (Unlocked) > Linksys LRT224 - BQM IPv4
Standard User TiMeTraVeLeR
(member) Tue 31-Mar-15 09:51:28
Print Post

Re: G.INP or Interleaving?


[re: mlmclaren] [link to this post]
 
Cheers mlmclaren

My line stat's before G.inp 16ms ping @ 59mb

Then I had the line G.inp enabled older FW stat's 32ms ping @ 49mb

Now with G.inp enabled and the latest unlocked FW my stats are 16ms ping @ 66mb

Edited by TiMeTraVeLeR (Tue 31-Mar-15 09:54:01)

Pages in this thread: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | [8] | 9 | (show all)   Print Thread

Jump to