btw what equipment are you using at the moment ?
I've taken another look (had to get a torch out as all my equipment is in a small dark cupboard with lots of wire mess around) and I have confirmed, based on the positioning of the ports at the back, that it is an ECI modem.
For everything else routing wise, I use my own equipment (separate Linux box, wireless access points etc).
So you're saying even with a downgrade to 40/10, I'll still have this latency issue with this modem simply because they've upgraded my cabinet with G.INP and not actually confirmed that this standard works with end user modems like mine? The ECI?
Insane.
Well, time to look at a replacement modem (that supports bridge configuration) I guess. I was going to try my chances with Zen upon my downgrade and possibly get the free Technicolor combi router/modem they are offering with new packages just now, and try and convert it to run in bridge mode, but I've read that it's a pretty hideous piece of equipment in general.
So looks like it might be a basic Billion job or something instead. I'll have a read up on it all.
To be honest, if I had some confidence that this issue was going to get resolved any time soon, I might not feel as bad. But we are talking about BT here, and I'm pretty sure they have moved to the stance now of not being responsible for the end user modem anymore. Have a read of this:
http://www.revk.uk/2014/10/bt-losing-plot-on-fttc.html
They are changing the service to wires only where they will not "support" the modem they provided.
So I reckon they've done this without a care in the world, to be blunt. And they are just going to leave it up to the end user to now sort out the mess and deal with replacing the modem if they see fit.
I'm a bit disgusted really but highly expected. Still glad I didn't go with them directly for my broadband.