Er, no. I did exactly what I said I did, thanks.

PM sent.

Well, there are two possibilities.

The raw dataset belongs to samknows, or it is nothing to do with samknows. The coincidence of November 2014 dates suggests the former.

If you are therefore publishing here a self-compiled analysis of samknows data, that would be interesting in itself. If you aren't, then we have no reason to accept your graph.

Ok, smarty pants.

BT, Sky, TalkTalk, Plusnet, EE.

What's the prize?

P O I N T L E S S P O S T

Don't be hard on yourself. Your post displays advanced use of a space bar.

In reply to a post by RobertoS:

If you are therefore publishing here a self-compiled analysis of samknows data, that would be interesting in itself.

It's no secret, this is declared in the first post and graph itself.

You don't declare the source. That was my point. I assume if it is samknows then you are in a position of sufficient authority to do this without acknowledging it, or have authority so to do, which is unlikely.

Edit - ohhhh, you've edited the graph caption. Why not acknowledge your error dear lady? You are always very quick to challenge other people.

Edit 2 - I think you probably need more than the simple acknowledgement anyway, as the raw data has not been published. Only reports. You need explicit permission, and probably approval. As things now are you are probably committing an even greater offence than without the attribution.

Edited by RobertoS (Tue 14-Jul-15 09:33:52)

In reply to a post by vimto_girl:

Yet no takers so far!

Hi vimto_girl. Any comments on my take:

BT, Sky, TalkTalk, Plusnet, EE (A to E order).

In reply to a post by alext05:

Ok, smarty pants.

BT, Sky, TalkTalk, Plusnet, EE.

What's the prize?

Not bad, 1 right out of 5!

Prizes are to be determined, disappointment guaranteed