Yeah i'm afraid that's all it says. I guess i'm just unlucky. Hopefully they do something about it in the future but i'm guessing we are the minority of their problems right now and would probably take a long time to do. Thanks a lot the help!
Back in the original thread,
I reported a few things.
The first was this:
The raw numbers suggest that half of the postcode makes use of cab 3, and half of the postcode is a direct EO line.
But that appears to be true of almost every postcode in the Carthorpe village.
Looking at the list of postcodes now, it seems that there is a big chunk which are now 100% included in cab 3. I'm pretty sure I wouldn't have worded my second sentence that way now...
When looking in detail at some of those "100% by cab 3" postcodes (on Codelook), they show anomalous data such as being both "100% by cab 3" and "100% by EO bundle 1".
Yet the proper BTW DSL checker tells me that none of the properties use cab 3. One example is DL8 2LD.
To you, that anomoly is just that. To me, it is a sign of some plans for "copper re-arrangement", which would re-wire EO lines into cab 3.
You might be right, that you're a minority and would take time to do. However, you'd be a fairly "easy win" given how close cab 3 is.
If BT want to reach their targets in North Yorkshire, they've going to have to target villages like yours, and cover EO lines like yours. Don't give up hope yet...