Register (or login) on our website and you will not see this ad.
In reply to a post by WWWombat:None are proof.
In reply to a post by BatBoy:In reply to a post by WWWombat:None are proof.Exactly. There is no proof.
In reply to a post by WWWombat:In reply to a post by BatBoy:In reply to a post by WWWombat:None are proof. Exactly. There is no proof. Yet you continue to make posts saying the HH5A supports G.INP. - even in this thread where it is completely off-topic. Which means your continual insistence that G.INP is NOT supported is not itself supported by ALL the evidence. Care to quote anything from the rest of the post that demonstrates how hopelessly wrong you are?
In reply to a post by BatBoy:In reply to a post by WWWombat:None are proof. Exactly. There is no proof. Yet you continue to make posts saying the HH5A supports G.INP. - even in this thread where it is completely off-topic.