Just have to wait and see now as I am getting RSCORR errors up to 65% on some days (averaging 18% currently) so curious to see if G.INP could fix this.

It will be intresting to see what happens, although RSCORRS are corrections not errors

Yeah I know it's just that it was always around 2 to 3% or less since I moved to FTTC from VM and over the past 2 weeks it's jumped to 65% which seems like hell of a lot of corrections.

I checked them out, unlike hauwei users all ECI users seem to get a reduction in sync speed, so this is a different g.inp configuration with higher overheads than hauwei users who actually on average were getting increases in sync speeds.

In reply to a post by BatBoy:

Line stats can be faked

Hopefully the continued rollout of G.INP on ECI cabinets is enough proof to satisfy you, Batboy!

http://forums.thinkbroadband.com/fibre/t/4471176-eci...

In reply to a post by BatBoy:

http://forums.thinkbroadband.com/fibre/t/4471176-eci...

Hmm, perhaps you don't recall your opinion when I first posted that the ECI rollout had commenced? I linked my source, a user on Kitz that had uploaded their DSL stats, line config etc.

Let me refresh your memory:

In reply to a post by BatBoy:

Allegedly

In reply to a post by BatBoy:

Line stats can be faked

In reply to a post by BatBoy:

So, you can prove line stats can't be faked? Anyway one swallow doesn't make a summer.

In reply to a post by BatBoy:

Start your proof anytime....

In reply to a post by BatBoy:

You only have to fake them in DSLStats which will then upload them to MDWS.

I'm glad you finally understand that G.INP is being rolled out on ECI cabinets.

Are you saying that you and Underzone are the same poster?

In reply to a post by BatBoy:

Are you saying that you and Underzone are the same poster?

No. Are you Underzone?

I'm simply highlighting your thoughts/responses when I first posted here about the user having G.INP enabled on an ECI cabinet.

It's rather entertaining to see how wrong some foolish people can be

In reply to a post by dave2150:

I'm simply highlighting your thoughts/responses when I first posted here about the user having G.INP enabled on an ECI cabinet.

I was wondering why you conflated 2 separate conversations

It's rather entertaining to see how wrong some foolish people can be

Whatever.

I'll be happier when the ECI modem and the HH5A support G.INP now