General Discussion
  >> Fibre Broadband


Register (or login) on our website and you will not see this ad.


Pages in this thread: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | [13] | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | (show all)   Print Thread
Standard User Chrysalis
(legend) Tue 22-Mar-16 18:05:29
Print Post

Re: ECI FTTC Cabinets still don't support G.INP?


[re: deleted] [link to this post]
 
for those updating here, please confirm when saying sync speed changes if line was previously interleaved or fast path thanks.

Sky Fibre Pro BQM - IPv4
Standard User choppersrock
(newbie) Wed 23-Mar-16 07:08:31
Print Post

Re: ECI FTTC Cabinets still don't support G.INP?


[re: Chrysalis] [link to this post]
 
My line seemed worse off than most. I had 2 re-syncs and ended up near on a 3mb loss on the upstream with delay and interleaving.
I had bt or out yesterday and showed him the stats fron pre and post g.inp. was worse off post g.inp
Agreed to put me on new pair either end and reset my line to see if it helps.

Now ds is higher than before along with us back to where it was. Snrm is much better as I think I am now away from my neighbour that was giving me crosstalk issues. Profile was reset and g.inp is now off.

Will see how things pan out from here.
In case anyone wants to look it up on mydsl, user=skyeci
Standard User lexden16
(member) Wed 23-Mar-16 10:53:04
Print Post

Re: ECI FTTC Cabinets still don't support G.INP?


[re: choppersrock] [link to this post]
 
My ECI cabinet was G.INP - enabled yesterday morning. Four years ago, my max attainable speed was 104000 kbits/sec which progressively fell to 84000kbits/sec. Following yesterday's intervention, my downstream speed is now showing max attainable of 88000 kbits/sec with an INP figure of 42, SNR of 8/9 and line attenuation of 12/11. Downstream bit swap is on/ upstream bit swap is off. Twenty four hours + on, the downstream error counter is showing no errors (ES, SES or CRC).

My FTTC is connected to a Fritz!Box 7490 using Fritz!OS 113.06.36-31667 Beta.


Register (or login) on our website and you will not see this ad.

Standard User Ixel
(member) Wed 23-Mar-16 11:06:17
Print Post

Re: ECI FTTC Cabinets still don't support G.INP?


[re: lexden16] [link to this post]
 
Without meaning to go off topic, how did you get the beta? I'm interested in trying that version on my Fritz!Box 7490 as it might fix a few problems around my usage of multiple public static IP's, when I originally used the device that is.

Can't wait until the ECI cabinet I'm connected to is G.INP, fed up with traditional interleaving.

Thanks in advance.
Standard User lexden16
(member) Wed 23-Mar-16 12:15:49
Print Post

Re: ECI FTTC Cabinets still don't support G.INP?


[re: Ixel] [link to this post]
 
In reply to a post by Ixel:
Without meaning to go off topic, how did you get the beta? I'm interested in trying that version on my Fritz!Box 7490 as it might fix a few problems around my usage of multiple public static IP's, when I originally used the device that is.

Can't wait until the ECI cabinet I'm connected to is G.INP, fed up with traditional interleaving.

Thanks in advance.


ftp://service.avm.de/Beta/FRITZ!Box_7490/english/fri...

Lovely interface and stable as a rock. Should be out of Beta very soon according to Whirlpool.net.au
Standard User Ixel
(member) Wed 23-Mar-16 13:25:04
Print Post

Re: ECI FTTC Cabinets still don't support G.INP?


[re: lexden16] [link to this post]
 
It's locked, I tried that earlier. Do I need to email AVM and hope they can provide a login?
Standard User RobertoS
(elder) Sat 26-Mar-16 17:20:39
Print Post

Re: ECI FTTC Cabinets still don't support G.INP?


[re: zebo] [link to this post]
 
In reply to a post by zebo:
What does it mean when interleave is set at 1?
That is Fast Path. In simple terms, the interleave depth is how many packets a normal data packet is spread across - i.e. interleaved with data from other packets. If it's 1 then the packet is by definition not interleaved.

See this more detailed explanation.

Kindness isn't going to cure the world of all its awfulness but it's a good place to begin. Daisy Ridley.
My broadband basic info/help site - www.robertos.me.uk. Domains, site and mail hosting - Tsohost.
Connection - AAISP Home::1 80/20. Sync 59504/15641kbps @ 600m. - BQM
Standard User deleted
(deleted) Sun 27-Mar-16 16:16:02
Print Post

Re: ECI FTTC Cabinets still don't support G.INP?


[re: deleted] [link to this post]
 
In reply to a post by BatBoy:
The HH5A doesn't support G.INP.


Some users seem to think that it does, but I haven't seen conclusive proof.

However, I have seen stats from an unlocked ECI modem, connected to an ECI cabinet that shows G.INP on DS only:-

Text
1
23
45
67
89
1011
1213
1415
1617
1819
2021
2223
2425
2627
2829
3031
3233
3435
3637
3839
4041
Line Mode: G.993.2 (VDSL2) � Annex B � Profile 17a
Status & Uptime: UP � 10h 31m 52s � Resyncs: 3Line State:showtime_tc_sync [0x801]
Power Mode: L0 - Synchronized 
Downstream � UpstreamAttainable Line Speed:66.090 Mb/s � 28.269 Mb/s
Actual Line Speed: 66.384 Mb/s � 20.000 Mb/sTrellis: D: ON � U: ON
Bitswap: D: ON � U: ON***G.INP: D: Enabled � U: Not Enabled***
Virtual Noise Support: D: Not Supported � U: Not SupportedInterleave Depth: 1 � 1
Interleave Block: 32 � 255Interleave Delay: 0.21 ms � 0.0 ms
INP: 44.0 � 0.0 NFEC: 32 � 255
RFEC: 16 � 16LSYMB: 16 � 5410
LPATH: 0 � 0Line Attenuation: 14.3 dB / 14.1 dB
Noise Margin/SNR: 5.1 dB / 11.9 dBTransmit Power: 6.0 dBm / 5.8 dBm
 Errors Since Line Up
FECS: 0 � 76 ES: 2 � 12090 
SES: 0 � 2 LOSS: 3 � 191 
UAS: 163 � 163 HEC: 0 � 0 
CRC_P: 1 � 0 CRCP_P: 0 � 0 
 Errors in 15 Minutes
Code Violations: 0 � 1 FECS: 0 � 3 
 Errors in 1 Day
Code Violations: 2 � 4 FECS: 0 � 46


FYI, I have been working closely with the user to develop initial scripts to harvest the data from ECI modems & ultimately convert them to programs to work with the HG612 Modem Stats graphing programs, so I do know first hand that this is genuine information.

Edited by deleted (Sun 27-Mar-16 16:22:17)

Standard User deleted
(deleted) Sun 27-Mar-16 17:57:05
Print Post

Re: ECI FTTC Cabinets still don't support G.INP?


[re: deleted] [link to this post]
 
Well, that's good to hear. There's no doubt the ECI modem and HH5A are hardware capable of supporting G.INP but the question is whether BT have released the firmware needed to enable this.

My HH5A doesn't use G.INP on my Huawei cabinet whereas my HH5B does.

Is this ECI modem running the supplied BT firmware or is it running a 3rd party firmware?
Standard User deleted
(deleted) Sun 27-Mar-16 19:43:22
Print Post

Re: ECI FTTC Cabinets still don't support G.INP?


[re: deleted] [link to this post]
 
It has OpenWRT on it, a version named Chaos Calmer.

I don't know if it would have managed G.INP with stock BT firmware etc.
Pages in this thread: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | [13] | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | (show all)   Print Thread

Jump to