In reply to a post by kitz:

I was told that both the ECI modem and HH5A could support retransmission in the downstream direction only.

Pity there's no proof that the HH5A does support G.INP. As far as I know, it doesn't.

Change the record

In reply to a post by lee111s:

Change the record

Weasel words

In reply to a post by kitz:

I was told that both the ECI modem and HH5A could support retransmission in the downstream direction only.

Hang on a minute... a couple of post ago you said.

In reply to a post by BatBoy:

That simply repeats Openreach's assumption that the HH5A supports G.INP, however I have already provided proof that it does not.
Does the HH5A comply with SIN 498?

I simply said "I'm curious how you could have proved it.". Have you proved it or not?

Openreach say it does.
If it didnt then it shouldnt be able to get PPP.

All the indications Ive seen appear to show it supports downstream only. A personal friend of mine got g'inped about the same time as me. Well Im assuming thats what happened because no proof on his HH5A, but he gained nearly 4 Mbps overnight for no other valid reason, which seems about right for the other lines Ive been watching which previously had INP3.

Jeeze this is complete reversal... 12 months ago it was me going around saying that the ECI modems and HH5A's weren't capable of upstream g.inp and trying to prove there was a problem with the ECI modems, HH5A's and TD-W9980. AFAIK I was the first to bring the HH5A into doubt. I spend months getting something in writing for BT to acknowledge that it was an issue with the upstream. It was also me who contacted TP-link about the TD-W9980's and got them to release new f/w.

Ive given you all the facts as I have them. I went to Openreach and had a long conversation about the issues with the HH5A and eci modems trying to help get it sorted.

Now over to you and the proof you claimed to have.

I'm out of here now, because I have plenty of other things to do... but Im sure others would like to be able to make up their minds from the proof that you can provide.

Already provided.

In reply to a post by BatBoy:

Already provided.

Where, please? (The URL to your proof would be appreciated.)

He's talking bull....

He's been saying he has proof for the past 2-3 months to my knowledge, but hasn't provided any.... the only things he has provided is snipped out stats from the HH5's Helpdesk and they looked somewhat invalid with a max attainable showing over 300Mb/s downstream sync...

For some reason, he seems hell bent on wasting peoples time and confusing threads repeatedly.... lost count of how many times I've had to correct his statements informing other users that the compliant CP equipment isn't 'compliant....

I suppose it's a shame he can't be banned for nonsense post's, though maybe spam...

Anyway, as I was made aware mid 2015, the HH5a and ECI modem are compatible with G.INP downstream and now so is the ECI DSLAM's... this has been confirmed by the industry, the industry's press and it's followers... oh and many user's....

We have given you plenty of opportunity to make your opinion heard and it is clear to see that people want you to be very clear and open about the problem.

Using language like 'weasel words' suggests that where people have complained that you are trolling and being obstinate for no real reason may have a point, i.e. its time to put the proof out for proper peer review or just shut up.

Thread closed to draw a line under what will otherwise become a slanging match.