In reply to a post by 10forcash:

As I thought might happen, G.INP is back... seems to be less invasive than last time though...
Stats recorded 03 Apr 2016 09:28:21

DSLAM/MSAN type: IFTN:0xb204 / v0xb204
Modem/router firmware: AnnexA version - A2pv6C038m.d24j
DSL mode: VDSL2 Profile 17a
Status: Showtime
Uptime: 1 hours 37 min 5 sec
Resyncs: 1 (since 02 Apr 2016 21:11:17)

Downstream Upstream
Line attenuation (dB): 11.4 0.0
Signal attenuation (dB): Not available on VDSL2
Connection speed (kbps): 51185 20000
SNR margin (dB): 6.4 6.2
Power (dBm): 13.6 -1.7
Interleave depth: 1 1
INP: 48.00 0
G.INP: Enabled Not enabled

RSCorr/RS (%): 0.0000 0.0033
RSUnCorr/RS (%): 0.0000 0.0000
ES/hour: 0.62 1.66

Downstream Upstream
General
rtx_tx 25 0
rtx_c 6 0
rtx_uc 0 0
LEFTRS 0 0
minEFTR 51174 0
errFreeBits 4734471 0
Bearer 0
RxQueue 87 0
TxQueue 29 0
G.INP Framing 18 0
G.INP Lookback 29 0
RRC Bits 0 24
Interleave depth 1 1
INP 48.00 0.00
INPRein 0.00 0.00
Delay 0 0
Bearer 1
Interleave depth 1 0
INP 2.00 0.00
INPRein 2.00 0.00
Delay 0 0

Oddly, last time it was showing as being active, the INP figure was 0, wheras this time it is (correctly, I believe) showing as 48.00. There also appears to be no negative impact on the performance, unlike a couple of days ago.

How come your downstream is so low with that attenuation? mine is at 16.8 dbi and I get the full 80mbps and an attainable of just under 90mbps

Probably the aluminium

In reply to a post by BatBoy:

Probably the aluminium

What he said

In reply to a post by 10forcash:

In reply to a post by BatBoy:

Probably the aluminium

What he said

Can you share graphs from your HG612?

Which one(s) would you like?

In reply to a post by 10forcash:

Which one(s) would you like?

Bit loading & QLN would be interesting.

Cheers

Edited by deleted (Sun 03-Apr-16 13:07:00)

There ya go!
https://onedrive.live.com/redir?resid=3CD50427430923...

Edited by deleted (Sun 03-Apr-16 13:53:22)

In reply to a post by 10forcash:

There ya go!
https://onedrive.live.com/redir?resid=3CD50427430923...

Pretty good for an aluminium line!

Cheers

It's had some work... the dropwire is copper, the pole DP has had the blue beads removed and the crimps replaced, from there the only other joints are in the PCP. The only reason I can see for the 'low' connection rate is the different reactance values of copper vs. aluminium BTO and TalkTalk both estimated a >69Mb/s connection on an impacted line!

There is however, some variance between the TBB speedtester reported latency and that of other speedtesters, along with the latency reported by the TBB BQM, It varies for me between 12 and 20mS, which is odd...
http://www.thinkbroadband.com/ping/share/542c2674961...

http://www.thinkbroadband.com/speedtest/results.html...

Edited by deleted (Sun 03-Apr-16 16:41:37)

In reply to a post by 10forcash:

It's had some work... the dropwire is copper, the pole DP has had the blue beads removed and the crimps replaced, from there the only other joints are in the PCP. The only reason I can see for the 'low' connection rate is the different reactance values of copper vs. aluminium BTO and TalkTalk both estimated a >69Mb/s connection on an impacted line!

There is however, some variance between the TBB speedtester reported latency and that of other speedtesters, along with the latency reported by the TBB BQM, It varies for me between 12 and 20mS, which is odd...
http://www.thinkbroadband.com/ping/share/542c2674961...

http://www.thinkbroadband.com/speedtest/results.html...

How did you get BT Openreach to do all that work? I've recently had a pair swap.