a full rollback, if you still have it on, then its only a matter of time before you lose it.

In reply to a post by BatBoy:

In reply to a post by woodroyd:

In reply to a post by BatBoy:

I have G.INP just like many others.

Apologies if this has been answered before. I have done a search and not come up with an answer.
How do I know if I have G.INP enabled on my HH5 A
Thanks.

If you're connected to a Huawei cabinet you can use the following G.INP Formula to determine if your line has G.INP enabled as follows:

Divide your IP Profile by your Sync Speed and if the answer is 0.9669 you have G.INP or 0.9679 if you don't.

and once again that is not a proven way to check at all.... different chipsets give different results.... please stop with this...

Works for me
YMMV

shame it don't for anyone else....

Works for me.

For a HG612 with Huawei DSLAM set up yes....

However it don't when non Broadcom DSL chips are in play.

Work for my HH5A and HH5B as well

From that logic then thats the argument settled, the HH5A support G.INP down, just like the HH5B...

or it means your line isn't G.INP enabled when any HH5 is connected.

In reply to a post by mlmclaren:

From that logic then thats the argument settled, the HH5A support G.INP down, just like the HH5B...

Nope. The results I published show the HH5A doesn't support G.INP and the HH5B does.
http://forums.thinkbroadband.com/bt/t/4476138-myths-...

See now I've just looked at that again and something has caught my attention....

With G.INP enabled on Broadcom based kit the actual sync is normally more than the attainable...

For example: SYNC:69319 ATTAIN:68284 (Taken from HG612)

Now I also saw this on the HH5A

For example:
6. Data rate: 19033 / 69194
7. Maximum data rate: 19033 / 69176

However oth of your samples as below:

HH5B:
6. Data Rate: 19999 / 76148
7. Maximum Data Rate: 24287 / 76746

HH5A:
6. Data rate: 19999 / 70778
7. Maximum data rate: 23506 / 72032

To me they both look like traditional fast path results.... I would say the '5A' looks Interleaved due to the 2000kbps unused in the attainable but this could be a bug or compatability issue with DSLAM.

PS. I'm not quiet sure how much you can trust the IP Profile system to be accurate either, I've found it to stick in the past, it has stuck taking 6Mb away from downstream throughput before now.