Yes, I was thinking that.
The bollards at the junction aren't illuminated either.

bearing in mind that codelook is for ISp and not jo public and should not be shared publically and is guidance only you could find out that when they surveyed it and found the cost of the power then the cabinet might not now being delivered / or might be shelved till the end of the prgoramme -- BDUk is about X coverage for Y funding = Z speeds over 24 m/bps and as long as that happens - difficult / expensive and problematica cabs will either be removed / shelved as they don't affect the overall number which is about coverage

In reply to a post by Fastman2:

bearing in mind that codelook is for ISp and not jo public and should not be shared publically............

Really? It is on an open website.
Apart from that I agree with you you 100%, the government targets are set so stupidly, that BT (OpenReach) has no option but to offer the possibility of a faster connection to the greatest number of premises for the lowest cost [edit: to BT].

Edited by deleted (Sat 24-Dec-16 20:36:09)

the website is public but the data is not and is upladed by someone working for an IISP using commercially senisitve data prvodied by Openreach which is not public domain information and only for the ISP's

so there is subject to change

Edited by deleted (Sun 25-Dec-16 21:14:15)

your edit is fundamentally wrong

--
the government targets are set so stupidly, that BT (OpenReach) has no option but to offer the possibility of a faster connection to the greatest number of premises for the lowest cost - (actually with the cosr peramater were set by each county and county had a price per premises cap it would, not exceed -- so question was usually what the maxium coverage we can get for the money -- nothing to do with cost to BT -- and all about Price per premises at the county level

some counties prioritised very expensive premises (well over the price pre premises cab) in early phases on their contract end so lost a 2 -3% coverage - overall by doing that and you covered significantly fewer premises than you would have done

The local FTTC gets its power from an existing traffic sign installation; but all the signs and light were removed, leaving an apparently unused, bare pole reaching skywards.

One sign was transferreded to another pole on the opposite side of the road; and if spotted by "users", guides them away at 90 degrees from the intended direction.

Collectively the traffic sign changes and removals are such that it raises questions of their present validity with respect to the legislation involved!

In reply to a post by Fastman2:

the website is public but the data is not

Well quite clearly that makes no sense. Either the data is or isn't available to "the public", and it is. As can be demonstrated, if you want to argue.

I don't think we should make a big point of this, by the way; because it was down to people reading too much into dates regarding the BT/OR checker ~2 or 3 years ago, and getting into a massive sulky abuse-torrent when the dates changed, which caused them to simply make less specific plans available to the public.

We just need to remember the word "plans", and what that means.

Edited by deleted (Mon 26-Dec-16 14:18:41)

In reply to a post by gazzyk1ns:

Well quite clearly that makes no sense. Either the data is or isn't available to "the public", and it is. As can be demonstrated,

Like many such occasions when private data is made "available" to the public ... if it gets publicised too much, it disappears.

Came across a D-side of 2.3km last week. Speed was 4.5Mb on FTTC.

In reply to a post by Thumper:

Thank you Paul

Yes the exchange does look like a converted brick shed

Most of the houses are either old thatched cottages, 10 plus years old "executive homes" or converted pub, school etc.

Going by P1s postcode, where it is shown on Code Look is about as close as it can be as the crow flies.

What is odd to me, is that there does not appear to be planned roadworks in the area in the next 12 months.

The building in the foreground with "Exchange House" on it? No way is that the exchange. That's not a BT owned building. That looks to be the old exchange that has been sold and is now a house.

Suppose it could be the wooden building in the background.

Edited by deleted (Tue 27-Dec-16 10:39:17)