It does indeed use a Broadcom chipset.

Thanks for confirmation. It would be silly for router manufacturers to still be using Lantiq or similar chipsets.

We had a new line installed recently along with a new infinity service on a relatives connection . Took 12 days from going live for g.inp to be enabled. The line had minimal errors pre g.inp

Did you go from downstream FEC + INP 3 to FEC + G.INP?

Edited by deleted (Wed 17-May-17 21:16:39)

The line activated in fast path with no interleaving or delay then went straight to g.inp. See btmaxcd on mydsl for more info . stats have been uploaded since point of activation. Note - its reported as eci but its not as the huawei cab can be seen out the window

Edited by choppersrock (Wed 17-May-17 21:13:41)

Oh my, it's skyECI! How are you? That's lucky re the minimal errors on fastpath! I remember that there were thousands of downstream CRC's/hour when there was downstream fastpath on my line... I would take downstream fastpath over G.INP any day, as I get 20 - 25 ms pings with downstream G.INP... Shame it can't be that way.

Edited by deleted (Wed 17-May-17 21:27:43)

As I said.. sadly not my line. Its a relatives line.. wish it was mine. 55/10 with 89mb attainable lol.. if only....

Ah, whoops! My bad! Is there any possibility that you may be connected to a Huawei cabinet any time soon?

I think my is a stable line as the margin has not moved and still on fast path for the last 7 days.

I did plug in my Zyxel router to see stats and left it on for a few hours and seen 0 errors in every counter.

For ny eci line sadly highly unlikely... the eci cab was full for a while and not taking orders and now it is so I think perhaps another card was added.

Edited by choppersrock (Wed 17-May-17 21:36:30)