General Discussion
  >> Fibre Broadband


Register (or login) on our website and you will not see this ad.


Pages in this thread: 1 | 2 | 3 | [4] | (show all)   Print Thread
Standard User simon194
(experienced) Sun 08-Oct-17 10:06:53
Print Post

Re: Estimated line length


[re: deleted] [link to this post]
 
My neighbours get around the same speed so it's down to the copper and crosstalk guess.

I used to get around 33 Mbps but that was because my line was originally connected to a temporary cable that was put in for the site and sales offices which was some something like 400m shorter. That has since been removed and any lines connected to it were moved the cable that comes into the estate from the next road up.
Standard User deleted
(deleted) Sun 08-Oct-17 10:10:03
Print Post

Re: Estimated line length


[re: simon194] [link to this post]
 
That copper is obviously very thin and poor then. frown
Administrator MrSaffron
(staff) Sun 08-Oct-17 10:38:50
Print Post

Re: Estimated line length


[re: deleted] [link to this post]
 
Or it could be that the line conditions have not changed so that the sync is virtually the same.

A sync virtually the same is not a 100% proof of banding, it might suggest its presence - which is what I am trying to get across.

The author of the above post is a thinkbroadband staff member. It may not constitute an official statement on behalf of thinkbroadband.


Register (or login) on our website and you will not see this ad.

Standard User Zarjaz
(eat-sleep-adslguide) Sun 08-Oct-17 11:14:54
Print Post

Re: Estimated line length


[re: deleted] [link to this post]
 
No, it most likely takes a longer route than the original temporary site office feed.

It is extremely unlikely that different gauge copper has been used. From what the poster says this sounds like a recently built site ... Openreach have basically only used 0.5 gauge copper for its new D side cables for well over 10 years.

Standard User simon194
(experienced) Mon 09-Oct-17 08:17:43
Print Post

Re: Estimated line length


[re: Zarjaz] [link to this post]
 
It is a new site completed started in 2014 and completed earlier this year. The temporary cable literally just came onto my road and terminated in a chamber 20m away from my house whereas the cable for Phase 1 of the development runs past the end of my road and along the next road up before coming down onto the Phase 2 houses and terminates in the same chamber.

You could say it literally goes round the houses. smile
Pages in this thread: 1 | 2 | 3 | [4] | (show all)   Print Thread

Jump to