My Line Attenuation at a relatively accurate length of 300 Metres from the FTTC is 13.4 db.
Your Line Attenuation of 19.1 db, suggests that it is substantially longer, thus greater losses leading on to lower speeds.
So although there is little or nothing that you can do about its routeing etc, worth getting a more accurate idea of how it travels to get to your house.
---------------------
I know of two similar blocks of flats, basically each block being built on three sides of a rectangle, the fourth sides being unbuilt and facing one another across a service road.
I was parked between them and noted that each block had a central phone pole, with overhead wires to each of their respective flats, typical of such places.
The westerly block is about 150 Metres further from the PCP etc, than the easterly block.
So generally that Westerly block has slower VDSL speeds than the Easterly block.
I suddenly realised that there was a solitary overhead wire passing above my car, from the Westerly Pole to the flat in the Easterly block, directly - not via the Easterly Pole.
That one Easterly flat is likely to have a significantly lower VDSL speed than the Westerly flats; and significantly less than all the other flats in the Easterly block, given that the line must be approaching 300 Metres LONGER than those other Easterly flats.
300 Metres = 150 Metres going beyond to reach the Westerly Pole plus another 150 Metres to get back to that solitary Easterly flat.
No obvious reason for that routeing.
I also know of much worse, in another location - although there is a simple historical reason for it, affecting about 5 houses. Distances involved are very significant.
Edited by deleted (Tue 12-Dec-17 07:21:09)