General Discussion
  >> Fibre Broadband


Register (or login) on our website and you will not see this ad.


Pages in this thread: 1 | [2] | (show all)   Print Thread
Standard User bkehoe
(newbie) Mon 13-Apr-20 10:51:42
Print Post

Re: FTTC: Not using a new line


[re: gary333] [link to this post]
 
They are quite good stats for over 1KM. You may have vectoring; run xdslcmd info --vectoring on your router and paste the result.

I suspect you'd get close to 50MBit if you upgraded to a 55MBit package as this would enable the SNR to go to 3dB from those stats by the way.
Standard User gary333
(committed) Mon 13-Apr-20 11:39:37
Print Post

Re: FTTC: Not using a new line


[re: bkehoe] [link to this post]
 
Cheers. That's good to know. I have been trying to find an attenuation vs. speed calculator but I've not been able to find one. This would make it cleaer to see if it's worth paying the couple of quid extra for the higher speed package (so ta for confirming it would). BT.com still states this line (and a couple of the neighbours) should only be between 18-32mb so I should be pleased.

Using Google maps and the measuremen tool (and knowing where this line goes) it's 1045m to the cabinet (if google takes into account hills, if not it'll be slightly more. As the crow flies (diagonal) it is 797m.

I have an older house (70's vs. 90's for the one I have been referring to above) and it's only 980m from a different cabinet (ECI) and that was lucky to get 20mb. So it's certainly clear that the Huawei cabinets are better (and pressumably the thickness of the copper in my newer house is higher) as I'm doubling that cabinet.

At first I was a bit miffed that Openreach didn't route this line via the existing ECI cab as it's only 728m from my newer property. In hindsight looks like Openreach did us all on the estate a favour.

When you say run xdslcmd info, how would I do this please?

Edited by gary333 (Mon 13-Apr-20 11:42:46)

Standard User kitcat
(experienced) Mon 13-Apr-20 12:58:49
Print Post

Re: FTTC: Not using a new line


[re: gary333] [link to this post]
 
gary333

None of the estimates would take account of you having thicker than normal copper. (They wouldn't even know about it) . However it may be taken into account when you get a speed registered on the checker, Bottom line.

You just got lucky!


Register (or login) on our website and you will not see this ad.

Standard User gary333
(committed) Mon 13-Apr-20 13:07:20
Print Post

Re: FTTC: Not using a new line


[re: kitcat] [link to this post]
 
In reply to a post by kitcat:
gary333

None of the estimates would take account of you having thicker than normal copper. (They wouldn't even know about it) . However it may be taken into account when you get a speed registered on the checker, Bottom line.

You just got lucky!


I am only pressuming it's thicker cooper to be getting the speeds I am seeing (the wires coming out the wall in to the NTE5 aren't any thicker than usual). However, this was an exchange only line originally and I am 99.9% on the path the cable takes so if it isn't then I've really dropped on. ADSL was terrible (c.4mb)

I would have thought though that BT/Openreach would have been able to see performance from other lines on the street though. Not complaining. I expected it to be <30 due to the >1km distance from cabinet.

I'm not unhappy in any way, i'm over the moon and just got this line so I can return to Virgin and get a new joiner discount. I expected to need the 4G and FTTC runnning together.

My only question from above was if there was a reason why the noise margin flicks from 6db to 3db at random intervals, and it is doing this without dropping the connection - which from what I've seen on here seems to be rare/odd.
Administrator MrSaffron
(staff) Mon 13-Apr-20 14:19:30
Print Post

Re: FTTC: Not using a new line


[re: gary333] [link to this post]
 
The noise variation is most likely due to noise source appearing at certain times and lowering the margin, but not enough to cause a resync.

Not rare at all but for most people the variation is small so noone notices.

The author of the above post is a thinkbroadband staff member. It may not constitute an official statement on behalf of thinkbroadband.
Standard User gary333
(committed) Mon 13-Apr-20 14:39:15
Print Post

Re: FTTC: Not using a new line


[re: MrSaffron] [link to this post]
 
In reply to a post by MrSaffron:
The noise variation is most likely due to noise source appearing at certain times and lowering the margin, but not enough to cause a resync.

Not rare at all but for most people the variation is small so noone notices.


Oh I see, I think I got the wrong end of the stick as to cause. So it's not something from the cabinet that is causing the noise margin to reduce from 6db to 3db, it's something firing up somehwere or other and causing the drop. Makes sense. What type of things are the usual culprit of this? It seems to be in the early evenings when I notice SNR is around 2.4db - 3db, the rest of the day it appears to be very stable at 6.1-6.3db. I am not noticing any other SNR's between 3 & 6db (so it's not dropping steadily, just in one big gulp).

Edited by gary333 (Mon 13-Apr-20 14:41:23)

Standard User RobertoS
(elder) Mon 13-Apr-20 14:53:10
Print Post

Re: FTTC: Not using a new line


[re: gary333] [link to this post]
 
Early plasma TVs used to be a typical cause. Even next door.

Something similar could be going on.

As a first step, have you bought any new piece of kit recently? Or aware of a neighbour doing so.

My broadband basic info/help site - www.robertos.me.uk. Domains, site and mail hosting - Tsohost.
Connection - Three 4G, tbb tests normally 35-45Mpbs down, 65Mbps off-peak, 9-24 up.
==================================================
"Democracy means simply the bludgeoning of the people by the people for the people." Oscar Wilde
Standard User gary333
(committed) Mon 13-Apr-20 15:01:13
Print Post

Re: FTTC: Not using a new line


[re: RobertoS] [link to this post]
 
I don't have anything new, however I do have a cordless phone quite close by if that could be a possibility?

Most of the neighbours are quite old so being broadbrush I would guess they haven't been getting giddy at Amazon lol. All houses are detached here so I would hope it's not coming through the walls. smile

WiFi is oversubscribed on the 2.4ghz band, lots of competing signals with at least 3-4 AP's on each of the main 3 bands. I do have a Honeywell Evohome (which seems to be suuspetable to interference frustratingly as it cost a fortune) and Smart Meters with the Zigbee handheld monitor that is always complaining about lack of signal unless it's on the otherside of the wall from the meters.

Additional. We do have a BT visual baby monitor too.

Edited by gary333 (Mon 13-Apr-20 15:01:43)

Standard User gary333
(committed) Tue 07-Jul-20 15:51:45
Print Post

Re: FTTC: Not using a new line


[re: gary333] [link to this post]
 
Boring update time: After approximately a 10 minute dropped connection at 2:50am this morning on the WAN side (exactly 30 days if anyone is interested on Now BB/Sky) and not related to a router reboot as that is showing >740 hours up time on LAN I have seen a further small increase in speed but drops in upload.

My connection speed hit the 40,000kbps cap for the first time. Upload speed has only got worse from the go live being around 7,980kbps for the last couple of months and only popping in to 8,000kbps+ this morning.

Never managed to get to the bottom of the noise interference issue I was having (it's on the back burner for now) so it'll be interesting if the noise issue causes drop outs or not as this sync speed will cause noise margin to dip to less than 2dB in the evenings.

Downstream
Connection Speed (Kbps) 40000
Line Attenuation (dB) 22.2
Noise Margin (dB) 5.6

Upstream
Connection Speed (Kbps) 8290
Line Attenuation (dB) 10.8
Noise Margin (dB) 5.2

However, noticed that the line attenuation has steadily becoming poorer increasing from 21.8 to 22.2 by approx 0.1db each month. Is this likely due to the weather?

For a 1060m + line looks like I should be counting my chickens.
Pages in this thread: 1 | [2] | (show all)   Print Thread

Jump to