No isp's want to offer u !!

In reply to a post by zzing123:

CityFibre is arguably better as they can provide symmetric 1000/1000 as opposed to BT & Virgin who with their dinosauritis just don't get the message that asymmetric is only necessary when limited by the technology.

They both sell their FTTP over GPON with a 32 way split.
It's an asymmetric technology.

My response wasn't very kind and I apologise. The world needs more kindness and humour not unkind sarcasm and rudeness.

Edited by CarlTSpeak (Sat 25-Apr-20 13:17:51)

How is Leeds traffic on the road? Your local Cabinet 82! Live in Wakesfield area in Yorkshire. Maybe you need a shave Mr Carl Thomas. How is your cat?

Edited by adslmax (Sat 25-Apr-20 12:11:44)

In reply to a post by adslmax:

How is Leeds traffic on the road? Your local Cabinet 82! Live in Wakesfield area in Yorkshire. Maybe you need a shave Mr Carl Thomas. How is your cat?

Wow so much to break down.

Cabinet 82 is in Leeds, not 'Wakesfield'.

Wakefield and Leeds are different cities. I'm fairly confident Hunslet cabinet 82 isn't involved my broadband now.

Traffic on our road in Wakefield is minimal. Traffic on the main road is busier however it doesn't go to Leeds.

We have more than one cat.

It's fair to say I don't defend my identity obsessively.

EDIT: You do have a point regarding needing a shave, though. I'll give you that one.

EDIT2: If I'm honest, though, if you came to my house I would totally invite you in for a beer. It'd be an interesting conversation.

Edited for tone as excessively brusque due to being in a hurry. Should be nicer to people.

Edited by CarlTSpeak (Sat 25-Apr-20 13:16:27)

In reply to a post by j0hn83:

They both sell their FTTP over GPON with a 32 way split.
It's an asymmetric technology.

32 splices was chosen because each ONT could also have 4 connections, and 32x4 = 128, the maximum number of connections on a PON.

That was definitely the case with 330/50 FTTP, as XG-PON would only allow 311/77 as a maximum speed for 32 splices. Not sure about bigger bandwidths though and if OR is even allowed to introduce contention as premises <> exchange has always been 1:1.

I suspect that 1000/110 would x20 and 1000/220 would x10 spliced to be uncontended (on upstream).

Openreach have never provided uncontended FTTx. It's why the documentation has a peak rate and a committed rate.

The ONTs don't have 4 fibre links in. They take a single fibre.

Edited by CarlTSpeak (Sat 25-Apr-20 14:36:14)

In reply to a post by CarlTSpeak:

It's why the documentation has a peak rate and a committed rate.

Where? This is important as it's the basis of an SLA, so that we can demand that from our ISPs. And please, I'm not talking consumer trash here. I'm only interested in understanding how an Ethernet product can be sold over FTTP if OR can't guarantee 1:1 like they can with FTTC, ADSL and everything else they offer.

Edited by zzing123 (Sat 25-Apr-20 14:59:05)

In reply to a post by CarlTSpeak:

The ONTs don't have 4 fibre links in. They take a single fibre.

I wonder if my 4 port ONT will handle another 3 Full Fibre 900 connection down that single fibre LOL

It probably wouldn't due to that was probably why they dropped the 4 port ONT to a single one, and I am not spending money just to find out LOL.

Anyone here got the Specs that they can share for the 4 Data, 2 Phone port ONT?

Paul

In reply to a post by CarlTSpeak:

My response wasn't very kind and I apologise. The world needs more kindness and humour not unkind sarcasm and rudeness.

Taken from your LinkedIn profile.

In reply to a post by CarlTSpeak:

I've an active presence on a number of forums, and a frequently spiky temperament to match.

I noticed that too.