In reply to a post by JESC77:

It worked!!!

jpm, you are a legend!

I'm so thankful to everyone who's contributed to this thread.

Thanks again,
Jay.

Hey do a little dance, your perseverance paid off and you’ve no doubt learnt a thing or two about IPv6 networking and perhaps even with jpm’s help taught the Daisy chap a thing or two!!

So have you got I all working with the UDMP as well as your ‘test bed’ TP link router? Presume the full /56 is working now and they updated all the details above which were clearly in error.

[I’d love to know what he said when you got it working - he was insistent their config was correct!!] As pluralist said, kind of worrying that they stuffed up something so very basic.

Here's a screenshot of my firewall rules.

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1MKatvPE98d8IXFqo4CB...

Here's what was said between Daisy and I:

Hi Dario,

That's fixed it!

Thanks
Jay.

Hi Jay,

Glad it’s all now working. Like I stated on the call yesterday the change I made limits you using any network outside the /64 configured unless the next hop is the address 2001:B98:301:2300::2.

This means if you were ever to change the next hop device IP on site or add another network etc and have a different next hop for this we would have to amend/add a new route, however the same routing could have been added on your device (I know you did try though).

If you need anything else then let us know.

Thanks

It didn't work with with 2001:b98:301:2300::/64 as my LAN, I can however use 2001:b98:301:2301:: to 2001:b98:301:23ff:: so believe I have the potential for plenty of networks. I wish we'd found this solution 7 weeks ago!

Cheers
Jay.

Hi Jay,

As long as the WAN uplink of the device connecting directly to the Daisy CPE remains as the one stated then all will be fine. If you add new networks you will just need to add a new LAN on this device.

Looks like there is some default routing between directly connected interfaces on your UDMD (that’s what I would 100% expect anyway).

Glad it’s all working!

Thanks

In reply to a post by Pheasant:

In reply to a post by JESC77:

It worked!!!

jpm, you are a legend!

I'm so thankful to everyone who's contributed to this thread.

Thanks again,
Jay.

Hey do a little dance, your perseverance paid off and you’ve no doubt learnt a thing or two about IPv6 networking and perhaps even with jpm’s help taught the Daisy chap a thing or two!!

So have you got I all working with the UDMP as well as your ‘test bed’ TP link router? Presume the full /56 is working now and they updated all the details above which were clearly in error.

[I’d love to know what he said when you got it working - he was insistent their config was correct!!] As pluralist said, kind of worrying that they stuffed up something so very basic.

Once I found the UDMP was working I put the TP-link back in the box, hoping to return it.

The reason for needing IPv6 is my Terragraph equipment which is for the mesh network for a large music festival happening at the end of this month. I'm providing wifi for the ticket scanners and everyone else except the public, the IP CCTV and connectivity for the bars EPOS. The whole festivals success kind of relies on each element working so I'm working relentlessly to get everything together.

The Edge-Core Terragraph kit hasn't been out long so their still ironing out some bugs which is worrying, they didn't mention that when I bought it. I'm receiving support from Edge-core for the Terragraph setup which I've had to put on hold until IPv6 was sorted. It works fine in bridge mode but that's basic PTMP so doesn't give any link redundancy. If any of you know about Terragraph, I'm all ears!

In reply to a post by JESC77:

Once I found the UDMP was working I put the TP-link back in the box, hoping to return it.

The reason for needing IPv6 is my Terragraph equipment which is for the mesh network for a large music festival happening at the end of this month. I'm providing wifi for the ticket scanners and everyone else except the public, the IP CCTV and connectivity for the bars EPOS. The whole festivals success kind of relies on each element working so I'm working relentlessly to get everything together.

The Edge-Core Terragraph kit hasn't been out long so their still ironing out some bugs which is worrying, they didn't mention that when I bought it. I'm receiving support from Edge-core for the Terragraph setup which I've had to put on hold until IPv6 was sorted. It works fine in bridge mode but that's basic PTMP so doesn't give any link redundancy. If any of you know about Terragraph, I'm all ears!

Cool. Can we ask what music festival?

What made you choose the Edgecore Terragraph kit, if indeed you had a hand in its choice?

In reply to a post by JESC77:

Here's what was said between Daisy and I:

Hi Dario,

That's fixed it!

Thanks
Jay.

Hi Jay,

Glad it’s all now working. Like I stated on the call yesterday the change I made limits you using any network outside the /64 configured unless the next hop is the address 2001:B98:301:2300::2.

This means if you were ever to change the next hop device IP on site or add another network etc and have a different next hop for this we would have to amend/add a new route, however the same routing could have been added on your device (I know you did try though).

If you need anything else then let us know.

Thanks

It didn't work with with 2001:b98:301:2300::/64 as my LAN, I can however use 2001:b98:301:2301:: to 2001:b98:301:23ff:: so believe I have the potential for plenty of networks. I wish we'd found this solution 7 weeks ago!

Cheers
Jay.

Hi Jay,

As long as the WAN uplink of the device connecting directly to the Daisy CPE remains as the one stated then all will be fine. If you add new networks you will just need to add a new LAN on this device.

Looks like there is some default routing between directly connected interfaces on your UDMD (that’s what I would 100% expect anyway).

Glad it’s all working!

Thanks

Is it just me or does that Dario guy sound like someone who doesn't really know what they're talking about, hurriedly backpedaling when presented with evidence that directly contradicts their opening statement,

If that's Daisy business grade tech support - I'm steering wheel clear off them!!

Sorry, I didn't receive a notification about your post. Been super busy since the festival.

It's Victorious Festival.

I own some Ignitenet kit and found the cloud interface pretty good, they were taken over by Edge-Core and I was told that the new Terragraph kit would use the same EC cloud, it doesn't yet and is still quite buggy so I'm regretting the purchase. I'm now told that Terragraph will use EC Cloud by the end of the year, I won't hold my breath.

I'm into Peplink now and have deployed a Balance 310 5G router on a small job, going well so far but the speedfusion speeds aren't as fast as expected. I'm bonding Starlink, Vodafone 5G and LTE-A connections, but that's for anouther post.

Jay.

Edited by JESC77 (Wed 17-Nov-21 19:17:09)