I've heard from providers (who won't go on-the-record) that 900Mbps or 100Mbps services won't hugely affect usage so it doesn't cost more to provide faster services (when you're talking altnet full fibre) in the sense of actual data usage.
Sorry for replying to something so late. I guess it makes sense they won't want to go on the record but it's pretty well known in capacity planning. The major expense is having to have the empty capacity there for users to burst into. As cable companies found out when providing tier uplifts usage doesn't go up proportionally to burst and after a point doesn't budge. Almost everyone does the same things faster.
Init7 in Switzerland epitomise this. Same price for 10 or 25 Gbit, customer just pays for the SFP28 optics.
This is what I expected, but didnt post it given I am not an industry insider, but to me saying no cost at all felt wrong, as there needs to be the ability to burst (AAISP e.g. spent on FB9000 to support gigabit services), your explanation makes sense and am glad you posted it.



Pages in this thread:
Print Thread
Chrysalis