QoS would allow you manage many people on 80 to 100mbit connection. Except most people don't use QoS.
That is true, i mucked around with it years agao, but I have no real use for it.
Its beyond 5gbits connections you start to run into expense. Plus windows isn't really designed for 10gbit plus connections. Linux is fine, it will run at 10gbits plus all day long, put a windows to linux connection in, enjoy the fun and games.
My partner has a fibre network installed and it works pretty well, but she uses Macs. Had to use a USB to SPF converter for them, but even the old mac trashcan can top a decent speed on the network.
But most of us have good old gigabit Ethernet.
fibre is better in that theres no crosstalk, your connection speed doesn't change with new people on your pon* its weather resistant etc. It can still break in many ways but its more unlikely compared to copper. Overhead and wind is its greatest Nemesis
Apart from the first week or so on fibre, I have had no problems, but then I only had one major problem on FTTC in all the years I was on it.
OR is reluctant to do symmetrical speeds because its their belief that it will hurt their "business offerings".
And yet it may hurt them by not doing it.
Adrian
Desktop machines Mac mini pro with macOS Sequoia, also pc Ryzen powered with windows something or other.
Zooming with Zzoomm FTTP,
Desktop machines Mac mini pro with macOS Sequoia, also pc Ryzen powered with windows something or other.
Zooming with Zzoomm FTTP,



Pages in this thread:
Print Thread
zyborg47