User comments on ISPs
  >> EE (Everything Everywhere) and Orange


Register (or login) on our website and you will not see this ad.


Pages in this thread: 1 | [2] | 3 | 4 | (show all)   Print Thread
Standard User Pipexer
(eat-sleep-adslguide) Mon 20-Feb-12 21:58:16
Print Post

Re: Brightbox oddities


[re: glossywhite] [link to this post]
 
Of course you have control over the addresses, thats what DHCP reservations are for. But like XRaySpeX said, that is kind of beside the point.

There are numerous reasons why a DHCP server should give out addresses sequentially and should attempt to give clients what they have had previously, it prevents clashes, makes things easier to administer and also reduces the CPU usage on the router.

There are reasons why you might not go down the normal route, but not on a home router.

Really, as far as I am concerned, the DHCP implementation on the router is defective, not just due to the randomization but the other problems experienced. You would have thought that orange would test the equipment they supply and someone would have spotted this.

I know this is pedantic but I've wasted so many hours dealing with [censored] routers in the past it just makes me angry that they can't supply something at least half decent. In terms of consumer-range I never have problems with Linksys routers - it would be great if an ISP supplied them.

______________
Zen 8000 Active
Standard User glossywhite
(regular) Mon 20-Feb-12 22:03:25
Print Post

Re: Brightbox oddities


[re: Pipexer] [link to this post]
 
In reply to a post by Pipexer:
Of course you have control over the addresses, thats what DHCP reservations are for. But like XRaySpeX said, that is kind of beside the point.

There are numerous reasons why a DHCP server should give out addresses sequentially and should attempt to give clients what they have had previously, it prevents clashes, makes things easier to administer and also reduces the CPU usage on the router.

There are reasons why you might not go down the normal route, but not on a home router.

Really, as far as I am concerned, the DHCP implementation on the router is defective, not just due to the randomization but the other problems experienced. You would have thought that orange would test the equipment they supply and someone would have spotted this.

I know this is pedantic but I've wasted so many hours dealing with [censored] routers in the past it just makes me angry that they can't supply something at least half decent. In terms of consumer-range I never have problems with Linksys routers - it would be great if an ISP supplied them.


Complain to Orange then. Is it worth getting uptight over? You have to realise that you're about 0.1% of the world population who would notice, care about or be affected by such things. Don't forget this is firmware version 1.0 of this router, as far as the public are concerned. Give them a chance.
Standard User XRaySpeX
(eat-sleep-adslguide) Mon 20-Feb-12 22:07:33
Print Post

Re: Brightbox oddities *DELETED*


[re: glossywhite] [link to this post]
 
Post deleted by XRaySpeX

Edited by XRaySpeX (Mon 20-Feb-12 22:17:34)


Register (or login) on our website and you will not see this ad.

Standard User glossywhite
(regular) Mon 20-Feb-12 22:12:38
Print Post

Re: Brightbox oddities


[re: XRaySpeX] [link to this post]
 
In reply to a post by XRaySpeX:
Then just delete it!


Please be civil. There's no need for being snappy.

Thank you.
Standard User deleted
(deleted) Mon 20-Feb-12 22:14:59
Print Post

Re: Brightbox oddities


[re: glossywhite] [link to this post]
 
It is strange why the box does not assign ip addresses correctly, but its not the end of the world.
Standard User glossywhite
(regular) Mon 20-Feb-12 22:16:44
Print Post

Re: Brightbox oddities


[re: deleted] [link to this post]
 
In reply to a post by amilod:
It is strange why the box does not assign ip addresses correctly, but its not the end of the world.


Supposedly this is the end of the world... but then again, most of us have a world outside of a router config page, and wouldn't lose sleep over it smile

PS: Amazing things, firmware upgrades, because even router designers are human.

Edited by glossywhite (Mon 20-Feb-12 22:19:06)

Standard User deleted
(deleted) Mon 20-Feb-12 22:23:44
Print Post

Re: Brightbox oddities


[re: glossywhite] [link to this post]
 
Anyone worth there salt would turn off dhcp, using fixed ip addresses is the only way a network should be controlled.
Standard User XRaySpeX
(eat-sleep-adslguide) Mon 20-Feb-12 22:24:05
Print Post

Re: Brightbox oddities


[re: glossywhite] [link to this post]
 
You may not realise it but Orange does not have a hand in it. They would have commissioned it to be tailored for them from an outside firm and have to accept it warts and all.

1999: Freeserve 48K Dial-Up => 2005: Wanadoo 1 Meg BB => 2007: Orange 2 Meg BB => 2008: Orange 8 Meg LLU => 2010: Orange 16 Meg LLU => 2011: Orange 19 Meg WBC
Standard User glossywhite
(regular) Mon 20-Feb-12 22:24:17
Print Post

Re: Brightbox oddities


[re: deleted] [link to this post]
 
In reply to a post by amilod:
Anyone worth there salt would turn off dhcp, using fixed ip addresses is the only way a network should be controlled.


That's what I do. It's pretty obvious eh.

Edited by glossywhite (Mon 20-Feb-12 22:30:27)

Standard User deleted
(deleted) Mon 20-Feb-12 22:33:01
Print Post

Re: Brightbox oddities


[re: glossywhite] [link to this post]
 
Dhcp was designed for home users, so no need to understand how a network works, it's all plug and play that's all a home user needs, no it dept I have ever worked in uses dhcp on there network.
Pages in this thread: 1 | [2] | 3 | 4 | (show all)   Print Thread

Jump to