User comments on ISPs
  >> EE (Everything Everywhere) and Orange


Register (or login) on our website and you will not see this ad.


Pages in this thread: 1 | 2 | 3 | [4] | 5 | (show all)   Print Thread
Standard User deleted
(deleted) Sun 27-Jan-13 21:41:44
Print Post

Re: Any had issues with the Brightbox?


[re: trolleybus] [link to this post]
 
Not sure if this has been made clear with all the chatter which has gone on.

Orange, like many other ISPs world wide block port 25 except for their own mail servers.

This is an attempt to minimise non traceable use of their mail servers.
Standard User XRaySpeX
(eat-sleep-adslguide) Sun 27-Jan-13 21:55:45
Print Post

Re: Any had issues with the Brightbox?


[re: deleted] [link to this post]
 
In reply to a post by Mike_Williams:
Orange, like many other ISPs world wide block port 25 except for their own mail servers.
But TT doesn't. Not sure about Vodafone. The 2 outside ISPs with which OP tried to use Orange's port 25 SMTP.

He did not try to use someone else's port 25 while connected to Orange.

1999: Freeserve 48K Dial-Up => 2005: Wanadoo 1 Meg BB => 2007: Orange 2 Meg BB => 2008: Orange 8 Meg LLU => 2010: Orange 16 Meg LLU => 2011: Orange 19 Meg WBC

Edited by XRaySpeX (Sun 27-Jan-13 21:58:00)

Standard User deleted
(deleted) Mon 28-Jan-13 16:08:59
Print Post

Re: Any had issues with the Brightbox?


[re: XRaySpeX] [link to this post]
 
In reply to a post by XRaySpeX:
In reply to a post by Mike_Williams:
Orange, like many other ISPs world wide block port 25 except for their own mail servers.
But TT doesn't. Not sure about Vodafone. The 2 outside ISPs with which OP tried to use Orange's port 25 SMTP.

He did not try to use someone else's port 25 while connected to Orange.
But TT doesn't.
Wow, I am very surprised that TT don't block port 25.


Register (or login) on our website and you will not see this ad.

Standard User XRaySpeX
(eat-sleep-adslguide) Mon 28-Jan-13 16:44:06
Print Post

Re: Any had issues with the Brightbox?


[re: deleted] [link to this post]
 
In reply to a post by Mike_Williams:
Wow, I am very surprised that TT don't block port 25.
Yes, I'm going by this for TT:
Are any services, content, applications or protocols always blocked on this product?**
If so what? NO
compared with Orange:
Are any services, content, applications or protocols always blocked on this product?** Yes
If so what?
The only restriction we�ve put in place is an email setting that helps protect our customers against unsolicited emails, also known as spam.
(For the techies amongst you this means we stop connections to non-Orange SMTP servers on port 25, and block NetBIOS)


1999: Freeserve 48K Dial-Up => 2005: Wanadoo 1 Meg BB => 2007: Orange 2 Meg BB => 2008: Orange 8 Meg LLU => 2010: Orange 16 Meg LLU => 2011: Orange 19 Meg WBC
Standard User Oliver341
(knowledge is power) Mon 28-Jan-13 17:15:31
Print Post

Re: Any had issues with the Brightbox?


[re: deleted] [link to this post]
 
In reply to a post by Mike_Williams:
Wow, I am very surprised that TT don't block port 25.

Sky don't block port 25 outgoing either.

Oliver.
Standard User trolleybus
(regular) Mon 28-Jan-13 23:46:12
Print Post

Re: Any had issues with the Brightbox?


[re: deleted] [link to this post]
 
In reply to a post by Mike_Williams:
Not sure if this has been made clear with all the chatter which has gone on.

Orange, like many other ISPs world wide block port 25 except for their own mail servers.

This is an attempt to minimise non traceable use of their mail servers.


My experience has been that port 25 is/has been acceptable provided authentication was used. But it is a changing situation that it is making it difficult, but not impossible, to find a common configuration that will work irrespective if you are using your ISPs SMTP server or connected elsewhere.
Standard User XRaySpeX
(eat-sleep-adslguide) Tue 29-Jan-13 00:11:58
Print Post

Re: Any had issues with the Brightbox?


[re: trolleybus] [link to this post]
 
What is wrong with Port 587 authenticated but SSL OFF?

1999: Freeserve 48K Dial-Up => 2005: Wanadoo 1 Meg BB => 2007: Orange 2 Meg BB => 2008: Orange 8 Meg LLU => 2010: Orange 16 Meg LLU => 2011: Orange 19 Meg WBC
Standard User deleted
(deleted) Tue 29-Jan-13 09:12:31
Print Post

Re: Any had issues with the Brightbox?


[re: XRaySpeX] [link to this post]
 
In reply to a post by XRaySpeX:
What is wrong with Port 587 authenticated but SSL OFF?
All depends on whether the OP's external (to ISP) mail server will accept traffic on port 587
Standard User trolleybus
(regular) Tue 29-Jan-13 09:50:47
Print Post

Re: Any had issues with the Brightbox?


[re: XRaySpeX] [link to this post]
 
In reply to a post by XRaySpeX:
What is wrong with Port 587 authenticated but SSL OFF?


None that I am aware of. That's what I use for this ISP.

I have working solutions for a few ISPs where it is possible to use the identical settings in Microsoft Office 2010 to use the ISPs SMTP server whether connected to their network or visiting another. The added conplexity is using my own domain name which often requires using strange configuration features found in that software..

As an aside, I found BT to be particularly helpful in trying to achieve this aim but their appears to be no solution. However they could offer to meet my desires through unwanted cloud based services.
Standard User XRaySpeX
(eat-sleep-adslguide) Tue 29-Jan-13 11:01:43
Print Post

Re: Any had issues with the Brightbox?


[re: deleted] [link to this post]
 
Most ISPs block port 25 at most, as per that Orange quote.

Note: We are only talking here where Orange is the home ISP, where port 587 is appropriate home & away. Other home ISPs may need a diff port or not have one at all.

1999: Freeserve 48K Dial-Up => 2005: Wanadoo 1 Meg BB => 2007: Orange 2 Meg BB => 2008: Orange 8 Meg LLU => 2010: Orange 16 Meg LLU => 2011: Orange 19 Meg WBC
Pages in this thread: 1 | 2 | 3 | [4] | 5 | (show all)   Print Thread

Jump to