"Security experts monitoring open Internet forums learned months ago that Sony was using outdated versions of the Apache Web server software, which "was unpatched and had no firewall installed." The issue was "reported in an open forum monitored by Sony employees" two to three months prior to the recent security breaches."
1. Does that mean moderators or tech staff?
2. Volunteers or employees?
3. Why did the "experts" not elevate it to the level you might expect if they knew this was happening?
The answer is that most of the accusations are "told you so" and "hindsight opinion".
I don't like Sony. That's because I own Sony stuff, it doesn't generally work in harmony with anything else, and it's expensive.
I don't like greedy business practice and could argue all night that an unregulated market is not a free market, but more a free for all. But Sony have the right to protect their product, as consumers have the right to vote with their feet and not buy it.
The lack of facts might mean a massive international cover up. More likely a massive international "make it up as you go along". Whether or not huge amounts of fraud take place, more attacks take place or all of this ends like the millennium bug or mad cow disease, one thing is for certain.
Aside all of the semantics, a significant spattering of vitriol within the online community (aimed at sony before the attack), has tainted the discussion and makes a balanced position very difficult to find.
A few years ago, wasn't Microsoft the target?
http://www.mp3car.com/attachments/general-hardware-d...
Like it says down there.
.
Knowing how it works is completely different to understanding how it works.
Live BQM
FTTC - Aquiss Business 45
37.7Mbps Downstream
8.45Mbps Upstream
7ms Ping