Technical Discussion
  >> Gaming Forum


Register (or login) on our website and you will not see this ad.


Pages in this thread: 1 | [2] | 3 | 4 | (show all)   Print Thread
Standard User time2die
(knowledge is power) Wed 17-Aug-11 08:36:48
Print Post

Re: And this is why you need 64 players.


[re: deleted] [link to this post]
 
Sort of private joke wink i will be getting both games as they both offer what seems to be a different style of game play................Battlefield is slow like walking through treacle and MW3 is Speedy gonzales on Crack smile
Standard User deleted
(deleted) Wed 17-Aug-11 08:54:48
Print Post

Re: And this is why you need 64 players.


[re: time2die] [link to this post]
 
No worries matey I'll be too busy with BF3 to get around to playing mw laugh
Standard User deleted
(deleted) Wed 17-Aug-11 08:56:23
Print Post

Re: And this is why you need 64 players.


[re: mrnelster] [link to this post]
 
I hope the jets and helis are easy to take down from the ground.
At the moment the helis in BFBC2 are too hard to knock down especially if you get some level 50 geek flying one.


Register (or login) on our website and you will not see this ad.

Standard User deleted
(deleted) Wed 17-Aug-11 13:16:40
Print Post

Re: And this is why you need 64 players.


[re: deleted] [link to this post]
 
On PC that isn't the case. At least when I'm playing, I send enough rpgs at that heli to scare it off.
Standard User deleted
(deleted) Wed 17-Aug-11 15:12:44
Print Post

Re: And this is why you need 64 players.


[re: time2die] [link to this post]
 
Wow, really? MW is one of the slowest DM FPSs I've played. Each to there own I guess. laugh

Edited by deleted (Wed 17-Aug-11 15:14:20)

Standard User time2die
(knowledge is power) Wed 17-Aug-11 17:53:26
Print Post

Re: And this is why you need 64 players.


[re: deleted] [link to this post]
 
Its a lot quicker and faster than Battlefields mate which is kind of sluggish with movement and has a laggy Killzone feel to the previous Battlefield games i have played....................I'm hoping both sets of fans will be happy when they finally get released and match the videos.........
Standard User deleted
(deleted) Wed 17-Aug-11 18:35:05
Print Post

Re: And this is why you need 64 players.


[re: time2die] [link to this post]
 
Well you are talking about CoD, you either move or you dont move, camp or spray and pray wink
Standard User mrnelster
(experienced) Wed 17-Aug-11 18:36:26
Print Post

Re: And this is why you need 64 players.


[re: time2die] [link to this post]
 
In reply to a post by time2die:
Its a lot quicker and faster than Battlefields mate which is kind of sluggish with movement and has a laggy Killzone feel to the previous Battlefield games i have played....................I'm hoping both sets of fans will be happy when they finally get released and match the videos.........

I agree mate. It is the 'heavy' movement I didn't like in Killzone 3 and BFBC.

Love it or hate it, the movement is one of COD's strongest points.
.

Knowing how it works is completely different to understanding how it works.

Live BQM

FTTC - Aquiss Business 45
37.7Mbps Downstream
8.45Mbps Upstream
7ms Ping
Standard User deleted
(deleted) Wed 17-Aug-11 19:18:15
Print Post

Re: And this is why you need 64 players.


[re: time2die] [link to this post]
 
Movement in BF3 isn't as heavy and you aren't as "big" as BC2, i wasn't a fan of it there either tbh, same with crysis, making small movements were impossible.
Standard User time2die
(knowledge is power) Thu 18-Aug-11 00:33:14
Print Post

Re: And this is why you need 64 players.


[re: mrnelster] [link to this post]
 
Its fast and frantic and that suits my style of play mate,call it spray and pray or whatever as long as it fun and not ruined by over powered killstreaks and hackers i dont care less if it ends up been called MW 2.5 with a respray of paint.wink
Pages in this thread: 1 | [2] | 3 | 4 | (show all)   Print Thread

Jump to