Isn't that contradictory?

Well, if you call that fast you should try Warsow on PC. Don't worry, it's free and runs on anything.

Really, MW is very slow for deathmatch. It has to be to work with controllers. BF isn't strictly a deathmatch game so can get away with being slower. Seems silly that they've tried to shoehorn it in.

True this, CoD doesnt hold a light to quake in terms of speed

Quake was very fast i grant you but there was not a lot going on in that game was there........

The movement in MW is fast compared to most shooters and feels really smooth compared to previous Battlefield games and many others.

Plenty going on with Quake, its about knowing your weapons and knowing the map and staying in control, unlike run spray die respawn run spray die run spray call in some cheap overpowered kill streak reward die respawn etc

http://m.n4g.com/news/826703
.

http://www.gameblurb.net/news/activision-ceo-respond...
.

I love the sound of hypocrisy in the morning

In reply to a post by FireFalcon:

I love the sound of hypocrisy in the morning

I must have missed something. Have Activision been slagging off BF3?
.

Just me and you playing Modern Warfare 3 mate by the sound of it

Personally i would by MW3 just for survival mode alone nerver mind the single player and Multiplayer that should keep me quiet for quite a few months............