Not your real age, but gaming age. Know young people who hark back to lower visual quality but more fun to play games

In reply to a post by time2die:

Obviously from your post you are a Cod Fanboy

Poor i doubt that very much,not much of improvement we come to expect ......Probably ?

This is Cod and whatever you think it will sell in its Millions come November and if Treyarch just up there game just a fraction then i think the majority of Cod Lovers will be very happy .

After all myself included now think that Black Ops is the better game and far more balanced than MW3 with better maps.

Funny how everyone said that Treyarch and BO were pants but are now saying it was ok

In reply to a post by mrnelster:

It probably won't have changed much technically,

Which has been the problem since MW2.

Only so long you can keep milking the IW engine with "refinements". It needs retired and replaced. If it's just a "slightly better" looking Black Ops, then what's the point? It appears they'll make this mistake as it's looking like yet another modification of the IW3 engine fork they've been using since World at War. Never worry...it'll have cutting edge features like HDR...haven't seen that before. Oh wait, most engines in the last what...8 years have had this? Christ.

If however they go down the route of doing server based PC play correctly and have larger maps and a large amount of weapons, perks, unlocks and ranks similar to BF3 then it might just be worth it.

If it's small and limited like the previous games in the series then it'll not sell outside of the console kiddy arena. Related to this - single player is completely irrelevant. Multiplayer is where they win or lose.

Edited by orly (Thu 03-May-12 16:13:25)

I never said it was pants i said i was never a lover of Treyarch in the first place and before the split up of most the team leaders and developers of infinity ward i would still think the same.

Having now given MW3 plenty of time i seriously now think Black Ops is the better game,i can not come to that conclusion until the release of MW3 .

I never liked World at War and i never will,black ops was a major improvement but at the time i still preferred Mw2,now after all has come and gone black Ops is more balanced and the maps are better...........Period.

Personally once max payne 3 is released and Future soldier i wont be playing any Cod games until the end of the year and thats only if Black Ops 2 gets favourable reviews.

Edited by time2die (Thu 03-May-12 17:30:51)

Totally disagree MW1 was Brilliant and redefined console fps.

So general opinion is MW2 was good, BO not so and MW3 rubbish.
Judging by that form I don't hold out much hope for BO2

I was taking your opinion seriously up until this.

In reply to a post by orly:

the console kiddy arena

I think logic can sometimes become clouded by a person's own preference.

All of the COD games are much of a muchness. If you loved MW1 I don't understand how you can lambast the sequels. It really hasn't changed that much, which has basically been the critical consensus of the franchise. How can preferring the new kid on the block make the old one any better or worse than when you enjoyed it. Do new faster Ferraris with innovative design make the old ones poor in comparison or simply define the new model as "faster with innovative design"?

Fickle fuzzy logic.

Haven't played for a week or so. Was hoping to play a little survival on MW3 yesterday but it didn't work out that way.

The only GoW I played was a snippet of the PSP version. I always think it looks great, but then seem to find something else to play instead. Bit linear for me perhaps? I am planning a games clear out and then I think I'll grab UC2 on the cheap, as I know I'll love it.

In reply to a post by mrnelster:

I was taking your opinion seriously up until this.

In reply to a post by orly:

the console kiddy arena

Console gaming: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XzS4GMYJbF8