Parp!!!!!!
Said with true style.
Been reading the PS4 reddit forum thread article but just came across this post on another thread:
Thanks for posting! Gathering data has taken so much longer than I anticipated, but I've been working on it. Here's a quick preview...
There is a performance difference between drives when launching a game, but it's a narrow gap.
Installing a game to the hard drive was identical across all drives 5400/7200/SSHD/SSD, which I thought was interesting. That tells me the optical drive is the gating factor, which makes sense.
The other big question was physical drive size. Sony recommends 9.5mm max height, but my calipers agree with the German site that did an early teardown and said up to 12mm will fit. It would be very snug and may affect air flow, but it will fit.
The 7200rpm/killer heat myth has been debunked too. Peak exhaust temp is typically 44C under load, and the drive cage was about 10C lower. Changing drives had no meaningful effect. (The 7200rpm drive was barely warm after hours of downloading)
Performance wise, there is no dramatic difference between drives. I think the sweet spot will be 7200rpm drives, because you can get up to 1.5TB at a very reasonable price.
I should be able to finish up the spreadsheet tonight, to share load times so people can judge for themselves. AtariXL
Another guy links to this article though: PlayStation 4 (PS4) HDD, SSHD and SSD Performance Testing
Seems there's quite a bit of hold up going on with optical disc based games (despite installation to hard drive). This, the author speculates, is likely to be some kind of constant disc checking DRM authentication going on that's slowing things down and reducing the speed potential differential between the three drives tested: stock 5400rpm HDD as supplied, Seagate SSHD and SSD. In short, if you really want the most out of a change in storage drive you'd be downloading your games directly from the PSN store.
There might be more up to date articles out there. For me, I can't be bothered with it all anymore. Though, in conclusion, it looks like SSHD does confer some smallish advantage in performance. I'm getting some serious deja-vu now that's telling me (reminding me more like) Timey isn't gonna read this anyway.
Essentially, you want capacity buy a larger drive and don't worry about performance too much.



Pages in this thread:
Print Thread
deleted