battlefront

So seems EA wanting to make this a FPS reskin of battlefield is backfiring. Lots of gamers are asking rightfully why no campaign, and apparently the fact no one plays campaign on BF4 is the reason. What the ????.

I guess everyone just wants multiplayer shooters right?

Im not that excited about this game,it isn't one i have ordered ?

Battlefront and Battlefield are multiplayer titles- bf3 and bf4 have had single player which provide about 6-11h of playtime yet the multiplayer provides 100's of hours.

Battlefront will be different to Battlefield, as the game is new code and is only using the frostbite 3 engine and their will be no destruction.

Is DICE doing it ? If so, run for the hills...

star wars games traditionally are campaign focused, and not everyone gets 100s of hours from multiplayer, personally I normally hate multiplayer as its too competitive rather than relaxing gameplay.

But the point of my post was why is EA using data from a multiplayer FPS game to dtermine there is no demand for a campaign in a star wars game.

I think they just doing what is the cheapest and no campaign means cheaper to make.

yeah its dice.

check their record since 2005

Its pretty much just a FPS developer.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EA_DICE

Edited by Chrysalis (Mon 17-Aug-15 18:54:33)

They did Mirrors edge which is a FPR ��.Runner

Their will likely be one or two single player games to come once the new film is out, Battlefront has a online co-op mode.

Edited by deleted (Tue 18-Aug-15 15:28:02)

Online co-op mode would be great

+1