|
|
|
Hi the BT availability checker states:
You can choose BT Broadband now offering:
12Mb *
Estimate download speed
7Mb-17Mb Download speed range
However my line is about 3.5-4km from the exchange and I get 3.5MB ish
My ISP (Bethere) uses the same data as when I called to enquire they said your line can get those speeds!! - I explained I have a new router and microfilter connected to the test socket - no extensions interfere (as I use DECT phones)
the Guy said he'd tweak my profile and upon trying to get better speeds realised the database is wrong!
He did a check to confirm the line distance etc
Is there a method/process to get this fixed as its annoying to see stuff offered I know I cant get..
Thanks
|
|
|
The BTw Availability Checker has no idea of BB performance with LLU providers and does not accept input from them. Its database is based only on historic line lengths updated by speeds whilst on BTw products.
1999: Freeserve 48K Dial-Up => 2005: Wanadoo 1 Meg BB => 2007: Orange 2 Meg BB => 2008: Orange 8 Meg LLU => 2010: Orange 16 Meg LLU => 2011: Orange 20 Meg WBC
|
|
|
What is the attenuation, downstream and upstream for the line?
The ISP you pay should be able to feed this back up the chain, eventually ending up with Openreach
|
|
The author of the above post is a thinkbroadband staff member. It may not constitute an official statement on behalf of thinkbroadband.
|
|
Register (or login) on our website and you will not see this ad.
|
|
|
What is the attenuation, downstream and upstream for the line?
The ISP you pay should be able to feed this back up the chain, eventually ending up with Openreach
Line Attenuation (Up/Down) [dB]: 18,8 / 56,5
BE there support stated they have no mechanism to inform BT the data is wrong!
I realise it makes no odds to anything but I'd like the data to be right so that as tech marches forward I can move to a faster sollution once it exists!
|
|
|
18,8 / 56,5
There is an imbalance with those figures, would expect a downstream attenuation more like 36dB. 56db downstream attenuation will be around the 4 to 5 Meg maximum.
This suggests that if some measurement systems are made it might reasonably think 12 Mbps is possible.
Does not happen to be some aluminium in the line?
Edited by MrSaffron (Fri 19-Apr-13 17:41:20)
|
|
The author of the above post is a thinkbroadband staff member. It may not constitute an official statement on behalf of thinkbroadband.
|
|
|
The BTw Availability Checker has no idea of BB performance with LLU providers and does not accept input from them. Its database is based only on historic line lengths updated by speeds whilst on BTw products.
Well my line length hasnt changed the checker used to say 2.5-3MBs now its far higher at 10-17!!
|
|
|
18,8 / 56,5
There is an imbalance with those figures, would expect a downstream attenuation more like 36dB. 56db downstream attenuation will be around the 4 to 5 Meg maximum.
what would cause an imbalance - an old/noisy line?
I get about 3.5MBs
|
|
|
Bad copper or possibly aluminium.
Basically looks like low frequencies are OK, but something is attenuating higher frequencies.
How sure on you on the physical line length. As a rough conversion is that every 10 to 12dB of downstream attenuation is a KM of cable
|
|
The author of the above post is a thinkbroadband staff member. It may not constitute an official statement on behalf of thinkbroadband.
|
|
|
|
I didnt think ADSL ran over aluminium?
Anyway just under 4km apparently
which translates to about 48db based on your rule of thumb.
Do you think my ISP will raise a ticket (I'm doubtful given the line length)
|
|
|
Aluminium works, just gives more attenuation per km, and degrades quicker than copper. Copper cables if not attacked by trees can last decades, hence choice of copper originally.
Unlikely, solution is to just ensure you know to take any speed estimates with a pinch of salt and rather base them on what you know your line is capable of.
|
|
The author of the above post is a thinkbroadband staff member. It may not constitute an official statement on behalf of thinkbroadband.
|
|
|
|
I'm going to guess that your telephone line/service is provided by BE. This would suggest you and the BE rep are only using the postcode checker.
BT BROADBAND AVAILABILITY CHECKER
Please note that the postcode checker is less accurate than the telephone number checker because it uses a best guess of where you live based on the centre point of the postcode area entered.
When I check with my BT phone number the data is correct. When I test using the postcode checker, it says I can get fttc and other services which is completely wrong.
Try checking availability with your next door neighbours telephone number if they are using a BTW ISP.
|
|
|
Please note that the postcode checker is less accurate than the telephone number checker because it uses a best guess of where you live based on the centre point of the postcode area entered.
When I check with my BT phone number the data is correct. When I test using the postcode checker, it says I can get fttc and other services which is completely wrong.
But all the best advice round here is to use the address checker if you can't use your telephone number.
The address (house number and post code normally enough) is reasonably good.
Yes - it uses the post code but it isnt the post code checker. The post code checker give fibre results for the exchange, not the CAB, last year when I was interested
BT Infinity 2 - IP profile 77 / 20 - super fast!
Previously BE Unlimited - 21,000 Download 1,200 Upload but then moved house - 6,500 Down, 1Mb/s up - gutted!
Ex <n>ildram , been to SKY MAX - 15,225 Download
|