But that's like listing inches along with millimetres. We've had enough of one, don't need it anymore. It could be that both are shown and I was the first to advocate this (in light of the response I received), but its undoubtedly an uninformed world. So, by that definition, MB will win.
After all, if its listen in MB, can't you tekkies do the math!
But that's not what you're saying.
You can say something is 25mm long or 1 inch long. It's just some of different ways of expressing the same thing - length in this instance.
But in this discussion you want to take a unit of information (bytes), in other words their size, and use this as the measurement of bandwidth or, to be simple, speed over any given time.
As I said in my other post, I see the use from a purely practical point of view but it would be shoddy to dispense with the actual "true" measuring standard.
Also note that there is no defined meaning of a "byte". We have a de-facto one but you'd need it in cement first before even entertaining the idea further.
Or we could just change everything so the size is also in bits. Eg "My connection runs at 6Mbit per second and this MP3 is 32Mbit (4MB) so it'll take me a shade over 5 seconds"
---
BT Infinity 8th July 2010
Connected to: P23 Kilmaine Road, Bangor, BT19 6DT (
NIBA)
600m (approx) to cabinet
25.5mbit down / 7.6mbit up
Previously:
BT Broadband, roughly 4mbit sync
4KM line / 54dB atten / 9dB SNR / Netgear DG834GT
Edited by orly (Thu 03-Mar-11 00:58:02)