General Discussion
  >> General Broadband Chatter


Register (or login) on our website and you will not see this ad.


Pages in this thread: << 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | [18] | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | (show all)   Print Thread
Standard User deleted
(deleted) Thu 03-Mar-11 01:07:31
Print Post

Re: Why advertise in Mb, when it should be MB!


[re: RobertoS] [link to this post]
 
In reply to a post by RobertoS:
In reply to a post by huwwatkins:
In reply to a post by tide:
Normal people should not have to use their brain in order to understand the true advertised speed of a connection.

I pray fibre optics are round the corner.
I corrected this for you.
Normal people have no idea what speed they are getting, nor do they care.

To most, sometimes the internet is fast, other times it is slow.


I agree - although most of the time its more slow than fast where I am!
Standard User deleted
(deleted) Thu 03-Mar-11 01:08:56
Print Post

Re: Why advertise in Mb, when it should be MB!


[re: RobertoS] [link to this post]
 
Common sense is all people want from advertising, the best advertising aimed to deceive will not trump that which advertises to genuinely inform.

Except in a communist environment.
Moderator billford
(moderator) Thu 03-Mar-11 01:09:19
Print Post

Re: Why advertise in Mb, when it should be MB!


[re: deleted] [link to this post]
 
In reply to a post by tide:
I'm only interested in debate on this issue
Not one of your posts has invited debate, they've simply been the statement of someone whose ego is such that his opinion is RIGHT.

Further confirmation of the style.

~~~~~~~~~~~~
Bill

[email protected] ________________________Planes and Cars and ...________________________BQM

Edited by billford (Thu 03-Mar-11 01:10:09)

The author of the above post is a thinkbroadband moderator but it does not constitute an official statement on behalf of thinkbroadband.


Register (or login) on our website and you will not see this ad.

Standard User orly
(experienced) Thu 03-Mar-11 01:11:46
Print Post

Re: Why advertise in Mb, when it should be MB!


[re: deleted] [link to this post]
 
In reply to a post by tide:
Nobody ever reads these threads in their entirety, unless they really care. So, to recap, the issue is that normal people know MB as the measurement of a files size based on files (over 1MB) being labeled universally online and locally (on one's computer) in this manner. Thus the idea of ISPs advertising their broadband speeds in the Mb range alludes common sense, as many are caught out by the fact that 1MB is 8Mb.

That is the real misleading factor in internet advertising, brought about by the current Ofcom irritation with ISPs (fuelled no doubt by either complaints or surveys of confused customers/citizens) rather than the crux of the problem, which you have just read about.

Normal people should not have to divide anything by a factor of eight in order to understand the true advertised speed of a connection.

I pray fibre optics are round the corner.


But you still miss the point. The size of something is different from the speed of something else. They're completely distinct things.

---
BT Infinity 8th July 2010
Connected to: P23 Kilmaine Road, Bangor, BT19 6DT (NIBA)
600m (approx) to cabinet
25.5mbit down / 7.6mbit up

Previously:
BT Broadband, roughly 4mbit sync
4KM line / 54dB atten / 9dB SNR / Netgear DG834GT
Standard User deleted
(deleted) Thu 03-Mar-11 01:11:51
Print Post

Re: Why advertise in Mb, when it should be MB!


[re: deleted] [link to this post]
 
That was rude.

Typical of the type of person who can probably muster less virtual Facebook friends than those in real life.

Do you really think people divide something by eight, ever. Have you ever considered people don't know that they have to.

There is a real problem with broadband advertising and nothing you have said has made it any easier, you've provided no better alternative o something which patently does not work.
Standard User deleted
(deleted) Thu 03-Mar-11 01:14:07
Print Post

Re: Why advertise in Mb, when it should be MB!


[re: RobertoS] [link to this post]
 
Fine, but they do quote numbers. For that I correct you. Not in malice, only in fact, they do have an idea, but its the wrong one. Much like environmentalists that quote ill researched statistics of a 30% reduction in this or that, but 30% of what?!

There needs to be a base element, something to measure against that all normal people are familiar with and that sir would be the all to familiar Megabyte.
Standard User deleted
(deleted) Thu 03-Mar-11 01:14:45
Print Post

Re: Why advertise in Mb, when it should be MB!


[re: deleted] [link to this post]
 
Then read, contribute and enlighten yourselves.
Standard User deleted
(deleted) Thu 03-Mar-11 01:18:54
Print Post

Re: Why advertise in Mb, when it should be MB!


[re: orly] [link to this post]
 
Not in simplistic terms, which what I see you are trying to use. In simplistic terms one would not oblige another to use divisions of eight in order to come to a result which could have been used as the value of measurement in the first place.

To make it simple, use a familiar value, work from that. Nobody is going to stop listing programs online in MB, so why not measure in that. The numbers right now are artificially high, its like measuring a building in mm.
Standard User nredwood
(knowledge is power) Thu 03-Mar-11 01:19:28
Print Post

Re: Why advertise in Mb, when it should be MB!


[re: RobertoS] [link to this post]
 
That certainly applies to my partner, most family and friends. All normal people in the sense being discussed here

Be* Unlimited
Standard User deleted
(deleted) Thu 03-Mar-11 01:19:44
Print Post

Re: Why advertise in Mb, when it should be MB!


[re: deleted] [link to this post]
 
In reply to a post by tide:
That was rude.

Typical of the type of person who can probably muster less virtual Facebook friends than those in real life.

Do you really think people divide something by eight, ever. Have you ever considered people don't know that they have to.

There is a real problem with broadband advertising and nothing you have said has made it any easier, you've provided no better alternative o something which patently does not work.


Have you considered your realy easy to wind up and exceptionally rude yourself.

Edited by deleted (Thu 03-Mar-11 01:20:45)

Pages in this thread: << 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | [18] | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | (show all)   Print Thread

Jump to