General Discussion
  >> General Broadband Chatter


Register (or login) on our website and you will not see this ad.


Pages in this thread: << 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | [20] | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | (show all)   Print Thread
Standard User deleted
(deleted) Thu 03-Mar-11 01:33:49
Print Post

Re: Why advertise in Mb, when it should be MB!


[re: deleted] [link to this post]
 
I have dispelled every attempt to squash a new method of understanding for the masses, good to know that people still revile at the prospect of change. Good to know its possible to rebel, even today in the 21st Century, in the 21st Century sector.
Standard User MHC
(legend) Thu 03-Mar-11 01:34:00
Print Post

Re: Why advertise in Mb, when it should be MB!


[re: deleted] [link to this post]
 
In reply to a post by tide:
Fibre optics are limitless in terms of considered data rates for domestic use, this is all about advertising for domestic use and so advertising would simply be diverted to the media services which came with the service itself. But before fibre optics will come the need for easier to understand speeds, which people can understand.

Companies have tried to measure things like MP3 album downloads, but that's going to be even less accurate than plain old MB (not that Mb right now is accurate). However if turning to a work colleague, in any environment but a technical one, the response will be a number like 12.7 then "m" and "b", some will know it to be Megabyte and some will probably think its Megabit etc... but essentially they will know a file is, so big, and then associate the advertised speeds with those.

Face it, no one really knows what Mb is in the real world and why its being advertised I do not know.


RUBBISH

Many many people know what a Mb is and in the real context of Mbps it is easy to define. If your colleagues don't know the difference between m and M then maybe they should go back to primary school and relearn their maths.

There are standards that define m, B, p, P &c along with data rates in bits per second.





~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


M H C


taurus excreta cerebrum vincit
Moderator billford
(moderator) Thu 03-Mar-11 01:35:00
Print Post

Re: Why advertise in Mb, when it should be MB!


[re: deleted] [link to this post]
 
In reply to a post by tide:
I knew you'd pick up on that.
Really? And after only knowing about this bbs (and hence me) for the last 24 hours?

A truly amazing learning rate...

~~~~~~~~~~~~
Bill

[email protected] ________________________Planes and Cars and ...________________________BQM
The author of the above post is a thinkbroadband moderator but it does not constitute an official statement on behalf of thinkbroadband.


Register (or login) on our website and you will not see this ad.

Standard User deleted
(deleted) Thu 03-Mar-11 01:35:03
Print Post

Re: Why advertise in Mb, when it should be MB!


[re: deleted] [link to this post]
 
Fiber optics are limited by the data rate of the tranceivers on either end, commonly 100megabits a second or 1 gigabit per second. They are infact not infinite, even the fibre itself will have limits.
Standard User MHC
(legend) Thu 03-Mar-11 01:35:49
Print Post

Re: Why advertise in Mb, when it should be MB!


[re: deleted] [link to this post]
 
Yes they do measure houses in mm.

The set of drawings for mine show my lounge to be 8200mm x 5800mm and 2700mm ceiling height.





~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


M H C


taurus excreta cerebrum vincit
Standard User deleted
(deleted) Thu 03-Mar-11 01:35:55
Print Post

Re: Why advertise in Mb, when it should be MB!


[re: MHC] [link to this post]
 
You really don't have a clue do you. Try it, prove yourself wrong. Go into shops and ask people at random, ask cashiers, ask people at the bus stop, ask people on the train.

You'll get a very vague and varied response. But you won't will you, that's why I'm here.
Moderator billford
(moderator) Thu 03-Mar-11 01:37:17
Print Post

Re: Why advertise in Mb, when it should be MB!


[re: deleted] [link to this post]
 
In reply to a post by tide:
that's why I'm here.
No, it's why you're back again smile

~~~~~~~~~~~~
Bill

[email protected] ________________________Planes and Cars and ...________________________BQM
The author of the above post is a thinkbroadband moderator but it does not constitute an official statement on behalf of thinkbroadband.
Standard User deleted
(deleted) Thu 03-Mar-11 01:37:19
Print Post

Re: Why advertise in Mb, when it should be MB!


[re: MHC] [link to this post]
 
No, its not. Nobody asks for a piece of wood in mm, or carpet in mm. The price of a house is measured in square foot and carpet is ordered in metres.

That is the real world, welcome.
Standard User MHC
(legend) Thu 03-Mar-11 01:39:29
Print Post

Re: Why advertise in Mb, when it should be MB!


[re: deleted] [link to this post]
 
I will get a varied set of answers because people don't know what they are talking about and have no idea of standards.

I will ask the first 10 of my colleagues I speak to later today: 1) what is the data rate of your broadband connection. 2) what is the normal unit of measurement of a file size. 3) Do you understand the difference between bits and bytes. 4) do you understand the prefixes used in the metric system.





~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


M H C


taurus excreta cerebrum vincit
Standard User deleted
(deleted) Thu 03-Mar-11 01:39:34
Print Post

Re: Why advertise in Mb, when it should be MB!


[re: deleted] [link to this post]
 
Technology will see off limits to fibre optics, as we understand it more, you know this. But you'll also know, if you had been following the thread properly instead of digressing, that this is all about the consumer/domestic market and advertising to families.

Families have music collections, videos and documents.. all in the MB and GB range, this is what they know and what they are comfortable with.

Precisely why then advertising needs to change for this sector.
Pages in this thread: << 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | [20] | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | (show all)   Print Thread

Jump to