General Discussion
  >> General Broadband Chatter


Register (or login) on our website and you will not see this ad.


Pages in this thread: << 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | [31] | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | (show all)   Print Thread
Standard User yarwell
(sensei) Thu 03-Mar-11 14:04:03
Print Post

Re: Why advertise in Mb, when it should be MB!


[re: Chrysalis] [link to this post]
 
am reffering to 21CN adsl2+ 20/24mbit services


do you have stats for sync speed distributions on these ?

VM does come out reasonably well, but it's the only fixed speed service OFCOM test so no real comparisons.

Phil

MaxDSL - goes as fast as it can and doesn't read the line checker first.

MaxDSL diagnostics
Are your kids pirates ? Limewire, Bearshare, Kazaa, BitTorrent, eMule are all tools of the trade.
Standard User XRaySpeX
(knowledge is power) Thu 03-Mar-11 14:17:14
Print Post

Re: Why advertise in Mb, when it should be MB!


[re: deleted] [link to this post]
 
confused

What zeroes did I add at what end? I gave you justification, which you chose to ignore, as to why it is the way it is and has always been.
In reply to a post by tide:
It has to change, because files are bigger now, the measurement has to catch up.
No, the standard bodies will just define bigger SI prefixes, not change the quantities being measured.

I wish you'd speak English.

1999: Freeserve 48K Dial-Up => 2005: Wanadoo 1 Meg BB => 2007: Orange 2 Meg BB => 2008: Orange 8 Meg LLU BB => 2010: Orange 16 Meg LLU BB
Standard User Chrysalis
(eat-sleep-adslguide) Thu 03-Mar-11 14:56:43
Print Post

Re: Why advertise in Mb, when it should be MB!


[re: yarwell] [link to this post]
 
In reply to a post by yarwell:
am reffering to 21CN adsl2+ 20/24mbit services


do you have stats for sync speed distributions on these ?

VM does come out reasonably well, but it's the only fixed speed service OFCOM test so no real comparisons.


no specific breakdown but the bbc is my source, the article which mrsaffron takes part has the info.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-12618350

link from 1st post.

69% 8mbit or below
3% close to max speed.
rest in between.

Edited by Chrysalis (Thu 03-Mar-11 14:58:41)


Register (or login) on our website and you will not see this ad.

Standard User deleted
(deleted) Thu 03-Mar-11 15:10:50
Print Post

Re: Why advertise in Mb, when it should be MB!


[re: Chrysalis] [link to this post]
 
Some one go wake up tide, this is funny to read
Standard User deleted
(deleted) Thu 03-Mar-11 15:18:36
Print Post

Re: Why advertise in Mb, when it should be MB!


[re: deleted] [link to this post]
 
I banished the tide.
Standard User XRaySpeX
(knowledge is power) Thu 03-Mar-11 15:55:09
Print Post

Re: Why advertise in Mb, when it should be MB!


[re: Chrysalis] [link to this post]
 
In reply to a post by Chrysalis:
69% 8mbit or below
While we are on the subject of units. I'm glad I'm not one of the 69% who get up to only 8 millibits per second smile

1999: Freeserve 48K Dial-Up => 2005: Wanadoo 1 Meg BB => 2007: Orange 2 Meg BB => 2008: Orange 8 Meg LLU BB => 2010: Orange 16 Meg LLU BB
Standard User RobertoS
(sensei) Thu 03-Mar-11 16:04:36
Print Post

Re: Why advertise in Mb, when it should be MB!


[re: XRaySpeX] [link to this post]
 
The thing is though that there is no real confusion about the meaning in the contexts where we see it. Similarly k and K.

What hasn't been mentioned so far as I remember though is the M = 1024 for storage but 1000 for transmission speed. That really is a pain, as they aren't used in a standardised manner by software writers.

My broadband basic info/help site - www.robertos.me.uk
My domains,website and mail hosting - Tsohost. Internet connection - IDNet Home Starter Fibre.
Standard User XRaySpeX
(knowledge is power) Thu 03-Mar-11 16:16:08
Print Post

Re: Why advertise in Mb, when it should be MB!


[re: RobertoS] [link to this post]
 
It was only a wink

On M = 1024 or 1000: It's not really significant for the purposes we use it for; its only 2.4% diff.

e.g. an 8 Meg speed might just as well be an 8.2 Meg speed, or v.v.
TBB uses M=1024 in its speedtests:
Speed Down 15904.48 Kbps ( 15.5 Mbps )


1999: Freeserve 48K Dial-Up => 2005: Wanadoo 1 Meg BB => 2007: Orange 2 Meg BB => 2008: Orange 8 Meg LLU BB => 2010: Orange 16 Meg LLU BB
Standard User RobertoS
(sensei) Thu 03-Mar-11 16:17:22
Print Post

Re: Why advertise in Mb, when it should be MB!


[re: XRaySpeX] [link to this post]
 
But 1000 in tbbMeter.

My broadband basic info/help site - www.robertos.me.uk
My domains,website and mail hosting - Tsohost. Internet connection - IDNet Home Starter Fibre.
Standard User XRaySpeX
(knowledge is power) Thu 03-Mar-11 16:23:24
Print Post

Re: Why advertise in Mb, when it should be MB!


[re: RobertoS] [link to this post]
 
Nothing like being consistent! smile

I don't use that, but NetMeter gives me the choice of Kb, Kib, KB or KiB, which should please, or maybe confuse, OP smile

EDIT: Being a binary computer, I always use Ki. Oh, and I use b for speeds and B for usage.

1999: Freeserve 48K Dial-Up => 2005: Wanadoo 1 Meg BB => 2007: Orange 2 Meg BB => 2008: Orange 8 Meg LLU BB => 2010: Orange 16 Meg LLU BB

Edited by XRaySpeX (Thu 03-Mar-11 16:27:34)

Pages in this thread: << 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | [31] | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | (show all)   Print Thread

Jump to