General Discussion
  >> General Broadband Chatter


Register (or login) on our website and you will not see this ad.


Pages in this thread: 1 | 2 | 3 | [4] | 5 | (show all)   Print Thread
Standard User deleted
(deleted) Thu 11-Oct-12 10:39:51
Print Post

Re: 21CN :(


[re: Andrue] [link to this post]
 
In reply to a post by Andrue:
The router is a Cisco 154x and has an Alcatel chipset which the ISP agent said probably doesn't help.
Is this model correct? Is it still a current and supported model?

Cisco had some problems with their lower range (e.g. 8xx & 18xx) routers and those using a HWIC-1-DSL with ADSL2+, for which they released some updates.

Make sure your ISP is using recommended firmware and appropriate hardware for ADSL2+

The following has some more information:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/routers/p...
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/routers/p...
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/12_4t/12_4t11/ds...
Standard User deleted
(deleted) Thu 11-Oct-12 11:05:52
Print Post

Re: 21CN :(


[re: MrSaffron] [link to this post]
 
Bonding doesn't provide redundancy or resilience, you should use load balancing for that.
Standard User Andrue
(knowledge is power) Thu 11-Oct-12 11:11:01
Print Post

Re: 21CN :(


[re: MrSaffron] [link to this post]
 
In reply to a post by MrSaffron:
There was a 1 hour segment of mixed red and blue 6:40 to 7:15am today and what looks to be fairly standard busy office until the early evening.
In theory there ought to have been nothing running at that time. We're a small office of engineers and I arrive first - at a couple of minutes before 7:15 today. I power cycled the router because I had no connectivity when I got in.

My Broadband Ping

It isn't normal (or wasn't until a month or so ago) for us to get any such blocks. If you look around 2pm you can see the result of me and a colleague applying Windows updates to two new machines that arrived in the office. Quite a bit of blue but not much red.

---
Andrue Cope
Brackley, UK

Just because he could. RIP.

Edited by Andrue (Thu 11-Oct-12 11:12:02)


Register (or login) on our website and you will not see this ad.

Standard User Andrue
(knowledge is power) Thu 11-Oct-12 11:14:27
Print Post

Re: 21CN :(


[re: deleted] [link to this post]
 
In reply to a post by WWWombat:
In reply to a post by Andrue:
In reply to a post by Andrue:
It's being tested now. So far the results are intriguing. I unplugged just one line and didn't bother to reboot the modem (it's a single modem with dual cards). Throughput has dropped (well duh) but that's all. No errors, no horrible ping.
I plugged the line back in, waited a minute then unplugged the other one. That caused a reaction. Killed the connection in fact. I've rebooted the modem now and it's back (on just the other line).

By "Killed", I guess you mean that the TBB graph went totally red? Rather than the red/blue combination?
Yup. I also plugged the original line back in and it didn't help.

So I agree that the 'red+blue' combo doesn't actually mean 'no connection' but it does mean 'unusable connection'. The mystery is why it happens and why it seems tied to 21CN.

---
Andrue Cope
Brackley, UK

Just because he could. RIP.
Standard User Andrue
(knowledge is power) Thu 11-Oct-12 11:21:16
Print Post

Re: 21CN :(


[re: MrSaffron] [link to this post]
 
I've just spent five minutes downloading Ubuntu (well running the download, anyway). I'm now going to plug the first line back in so that both lines are active. I won't reboot the modem though.

Edit: The router detected and and seamlessly increased our bandwidth back to the dizzy heights of 3.2/0.7.

---
Andrue Cope
Brackley, UK

Just because he could. RIP.

Edited by Andrue (Thu 11-Oct-12 11:25:42)

Administrator MrSaffron
(staff) Thu 11-Oct-12 11:54:22
Print Post

Re: 21CN :(


[re: Andrue] [link to this post]
 
Try saturating your upstream too

Andrew Ferguson, [email protected]
www.thinkbroadband.com - formerly known as ADSLguide.org.uk
The author of the above post is a thinkbroadband staff member. It may not constitute an official statement on behalf of thinkbroadband.
Standard User Andrue
(knowledge is power) Thu 11-Oct-12 12:24:00
Print Post

Re: 21CN :(


[re: MrSaffron] [link to this post]
 
In reply to a post by MrSaffron:
Try saturating your upstream too
Okay I just did that. Aside from slightly slowing down browsing it didn't really do much.

My Broadband Ping

The red block is because our ISP asked us to turn the router off for 15 minutes to clear some stale sessions. They say there should be no problem reconfiguring our router to ADSL but they want to see how it runs for a few more hours.

---
Andrue Cope
Brackley, UK

Just because he could. RIP.
Standard User b4dger
(knowledge is power) Thu 11-Oct-12 12:36:52
Print Post

Re: 21CN :(


[re: Andrue] [link to this post]
 
I would try forcing ADSL or ADSL2 modulation like a few others here have mentioned smile

This seems to stabilise ADSL2+/21CN connections for those on longer lines.

Standard User Chrysalis
(eat-sleep-adslguide) Sun 14-Oct-12 21:40:12
Print Post

Re: 21CN :(


[re: deleted] [link to this post]
 
In reply to a post by FRS_Plunderer:
In reply to a post by Chrysalis:
openreach do the home visits and probably provide stats from those visits on what they think are home wiring faults.


And your evidence that the stats are wrong is?


your evidence of them been right?

my view is based on a few things.

1 - my personal experience.
2 - aaisp's point of view.
3 - the long line policy from openreach where if a line is long a proper investigation isnt even carried out.
Anonymous
(Unregistered)Sun 14-Oct-12 22:46:58
Print Post

Re: 21CN :(


[re: MrSaffron] [link to this post]
 
Do Cisco routers of this class really not have the SNMP Line MIB? Do "quality" ISPs really not have support people who know how to access it and plot it with MRTG and the like? We know BTwholesale are incapable of (or unwilling to do) that kind of thing, but then what are they capable of...

Get a look at the line error rate, sync speed, and SNR margin. Raw, rather than several levels of layering away, as the effects seen at IP level inevitably are.

Looking at IP-level figures is, as you have already pointed out, not an ideal way to debug a possible lower-layer (line level) problem, which the TCP layer will do its very bestest to mask (yes I know PING isn't TCP, but...).
Pages in this thread: 1 | 2 | 3 | [4] | 5 | (show all)   Print Thread

Jump to