In reply to a post by professor973:

In reply to a post by kasg:

In reply to a post by professor973:

Evening, weekend and mobile calls included here.
http://www.postoffice.co.uk/home-phone-broadband-extra

No, weekend calls to mobiles, which isn't quite what you said.

Wake up please. I should know as my line IS with the Post Office and calls to mobiles and 40 countries are included at weekends., I suggest you read your link carefully,

Why am I so stupid? Why did I respond to you? All you are doing is agreeing with me, that's what I meant and is definitely not what you said in your original post!

I am sorry, but I think you are stupid. I was responding about no evening calls from another supplier, with the fact that evening calls AND mobile calls are inclusive with the Post Office. Something you then incorrectly contradicted, so one of us is stupid. One guess only! If you bother to read my post, you will see I did not call you stupid, but simply requested you wake up and pay attention.

Edited by professor973 (Sun 12-May-13 18:51:33)

Stop calling people stupid, its easy to misread package pages.

The fact someone has misread a page, does not mean you should belittle them

In reply to a post by MrSaffron:

Stop calling people stupid, its easy to misread package pages.

The fact someone has misread a page, does not mean you should belittle them

Come on. Be fair. I did not initially call him stupid. I only did after being falsely accused of doing so.

In reply to a post by professor973:

I am sorry, but I think you are stupid. I was responding about no evening calls from another supplier, with the fact that evening calls AND mobiles are inclusive with the Post Office. Something you then incorrectly contradicted, so one of us is stupid. One guess only! If you bother to read my post, you will see I did not call you stupid, but simply requested you wake up and pay attention.

Once again, what you actually said was "Evening, weekend and mobile calls included here." There is only one way to interpret that in standard English, which is evening calls, weekend calls and calls to mobiles. You have even done it again in your latest post: "evening calls AND mobiles are inclusive". Do you really not understand?

In reply to a post by MrSaffron:

The fact someone has misread a page, does not mean you should belittle them

Unless I am going mad, I didn't misread the page! If someone could explain to me what I misread I would be grateful.

In reply to a post by professor973:

Come on. Be fair. I did not initially call him stupid. I only did after being falsely accused of doing so.

I didn't accuse you of calling me stupid, I called myself stupid for trying to have a rational discussion with you!

In reply to a post by kasg:

In reply to a post by professor973:

I am sorry, but I think you are stupid. I was responding about no evening calls from another supplier, with the fact that evening calls AND mobiles are inclusive with the Post Office. Something you then incorrectly contradicted, so one of us is stupid. One guess only! If you bother to read my post, you will see I did not call you stupid, but simply requested you wake up and pay attention.

Once again, what you actually said was "Evening, weekend and mobile calls included here." There is only one way to interpret that in standard English, which is evening calls, weekend calls and calls to mobiles. You have even done it again in your latest post: "evening calls AND mobiles are inclusive". Do you really not understand?

AS I SAID - CHECK THE LINK AGAIN UNDER ALSO INCLUDED. I UNDERSTAND, BUT OBVIOUSLY YOU DON'T.

No need to shout either.

In reply to a post by professor973:

AS I SAID - CHECK THE LINK AGAIN UNDER ALSO INCLUDED. I UNDERSTAND, BUT OBVIOUSLY YOU DON'T.

All I can see on that page is that calls to mobiles are included at weekends, which is what I have been saying all along and you keep contradicting with your use of the word AND.