In reply to a post by kasg:

In reply to a post by professor973:

I am sorry, I am not shouting, I was typing in capitals.

I don't often LOL but I did to that! I stopped short of ROFL though.

Good - One thing I cannot stand is when people feel Lol has to be hung onto every statement, even seroius ones. Sis

No weekend calls here, mean none to me, so looks like we are looping!

Edited by professor973 (Sun 12-May-13 19:09:57)

Now I am lost

The website clearly states that calls to mobiles are at a 0p cost at weekends, and 5p per minute during the evenings in the week.

So am I. As I said, I was simply trying to point the OP to a supplier that still offered evening calls as well as W/E in it's package, also mentioning that the PO also included calls to mobiles. I did not state the inclusive mobile calls were 24/7. I then get a reply of 'no weekend mobile calls here' pointing to my link and all hell broke loose from there. Like a game of football, two can watch the same game and see a different one! Anyway, really have better things to do now it's stopped raining.

Edited by professor973 (Sun 12-May-13 19:22:15)

I apologise for replying to the wrong post here, but later posts do not have the option, possibly because of a suspension. I think I have finally worked out what happened here, professor973 appears to be comma-blind and read "No, weekend calls to mobiles, which isn't quite what you said" as "No weekend calls to mobiles which isn't quite what you said". People often protest that spelling, grammar and punctuation isn't important on forums, well sometimes it clearly is. I thought that my emboldening made it pretty clear what I meant.

Edited by kasg (Mon 13-May-13 09:43:14)

It was fairly obvious what went wrong here. There is no point in continuing it and is absolutely no use to the OP.

And I'll close the sub thread again