General Discussion
  >> General Broadband Chatter


Register (or login) on our website and you will not see this ad.


Pages in this thread: 1 | [2] | (show all)   Print Thread
Standard User Michael_Chare
(committed) Sat 19-Apr-14 00:19:50
Print Post

Re: Sky/TalkTalk/CityFibre in York


[re: RobertoS] [link to this post]
 
Less than the cost per property of many of the BDUK funded projects which are FTTC.

Michael Chare
Standard User deleted
(deleted) Sat 19-Apr-14 00:41:40
Print Post

Re: Sky/TalkTalk/CityFibre in York


[re: MrSaffron] [link to this post]
 
In reply to a post by MrSaffron:
Though there is a counter idea, if Openreach loses a lot of its 'wholesale' revenue BT could make distinct overtures for the equivalence to be watered down so a more vertically integrated BT Retail Infinity service was possible, at the expense of the smaller operators who only represent 3 to 6% of the market (6% includes EE)


Fingers crossed Ofcom tell them to go forth and compete by investing rather than spending as little as possible on a basic FTTC solution. May loosen the grip on the purse strings the short-termist shareholders have.

Sure this network won't be wholesale too?
Standard User Andrue
(knowledge is power) Sat 19-Apr-14 09:08:47
Print Post

Re: Sky/TalkTalk/CityFibre in York


[re: Michael_Chare] [link to this post]
 
In reply to a post by Michael_Chare:
Less than the cost per property of many of the BDUK funded projects which are FTTC.
Of course. Most of BDUK is rural which has inherently greater costs.

---
Andrue Cope
Brackley, UK


Register (or login) on our website and you will not see this ad.

Standard User Michael_Chare
(committed) Sat 19-Apr-14 11:47:31
Print Post

Re: Sky/TalkTalk/CityFibre in York


[re: Andrue] [link to this post]
 
In reply to a post by Andrue:
In reply to a post by Michael_Chare:
Less than the cost per property of many of the BDUK funded projects which are FTTC.
Of course. Most of BDUK is rural which has inherently greater costs.
However mostly the BDUK projects just connect to a cabinet. This project is for FTTP where a connection has to be made to each property.

Michael Chare
Standard User Andrue
(knowledge is power) Sat 19-Apr-14 15:55:39
Print Post

Re: Sky/TalkTalk/CityFibre in York


[re: Michael_Chare] [link to this post]
 
In reply to a post by Michael_Chare:
In reply to a post by Andrue:
In reply to a post by Michael_Chare:
Less than the cost per property of many of the BDUK funded projects which are FTTC.
Of course. Most of BDUK is rural which has inherently greater costs.
However mostly the BDUK projects just connect to a cabinet. This project is for FTTP where a connection has to be made to each property.
True but population density will always win out. Installers just don't have to travel as far in order to cover as many properties. If you had ten thousand leaflets to hand out it'll cost you less in time and fuel if you are doing it in a city. Despite all the technological advances geography and demographics still offer a huge advantage to cities. That's why they continue to grow at the expense of rural communities.

---
Andrue Cope
Brackley, UK
Administrator MrSaffron
(staff) Sat 19-Apr-14 18:56:39
Print Post

Re: Sky/TalkTalk/CityFibre in York


[re: Andrue] [link to this post]
 
£5 million from TalkTalk
£5 million from Sky
£5 million from CityFIbre

Plus fact that core network is being utilised by businesses and local council as a major user which means a lot of FTTP will be already deployed in theory

Andrew Ferguson, [email protected]
www.thinkbroadband.com - formerly known as ADSLguide.org.uk
The author of the above post is a thinkbroadband staff member. It may not constitute an official statement on behalf of thinkbroadband.
Pages in this thread: 1 | [2] | (show all)   Print Thread

Jump to