General Discussion
  >> General Broadband Chatter


Register (or login) on our website and you will not see this ad.


Pages in this thread: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | [6] | (show all)   Print Thread
Standard User Oliver341
(eat-sleep-adslguide) Tue 09-Jun-15 00:23:44
Print Post

Re: Turned on per user display now


[re: jchamier] [link to this post]
 
In reply to a post by jchamier:
Many use the PPP extensions to run at 1500 now as well, I can on PlusNet and did on BT both on FTTC.

Yeah, most networks are happy to run at 1500 MTU on PPPoA, with the notable exception of TalkTalk which is limited to 1492. Not sure how many networks run extensions to raise PPPoE to 1500, but that always struck me as overkill for the extra 8 bytes.

Oliver.
Standard User Chrysalis
(legend) Tue 16-Jun-15 12:27:02
Print Post

Re: Turned on per user display now


[re: bobble_bob] [link to this post]
 
Well yesterday I got a new ac68.

The ac66 cannot handle pppoe at full FTTC sync speed without CTF, and it defenitly cannot handle it with QoS enabled.

My new AC68 can and now i enabled QoS, I set upstream to 90% of the normal speed, left downspeed on full and now massive improvement.

I get an A on the dslreports test, and I also observed e.g. if I have the tbb test running both up and down has no affect on ssh latency, smooth as silk, before it became a jerk fest.

Plusnet Fibre Unlimited BQM - IPv4 BQM - IPv6
Standard User deleted
(deleted) Sat 25-Jul-15 14:05:21
Print Post

Re: Turned on per user display now


[re: Oliver341] [link to this post]
 
I'm on TalkTalk Fibre.

I'm using these scripts and I'm still finding latency to be a little bit too high when downloading but not when uploading.

I read above that TalkTalk does PPP differently, does that mean I need to set a different overhead?


Register (or login) on our website and you will not see this ad.

Standard User Oliver341
(eat-sleep-adslguide) Sat 25-Jul-15 18:25:50
Print Post

Re: Turned on per user display now


[re: deleted] [link to this post]
 
In reply to a post by arobertson545:
I read above that TalkTalk does PPP differently, does that mean I need to set a different overhead?

No. But I would ignore the usual TalkTalk advice of using an MTU of 1432 and use 1492 instead.

Oliver.
Standard User deleted
(deleted) Sat 25-Jul-15 23:37:07
Print Post

Re: Turned on per user display now


[re: Oliver341] [link to this post]
 
I'm just curious how much bandwith people here are losing with the methods to control Bufferbloat?

Is 3Mb or so a normal amount?
Standard User Chrysalis
(legend) Sun 26-Jul-15 00:37:43
Print Post

Re: Turned on per user display now


[re: deleted] [link to this post]
 
well is latency or speed capacity more important to you?

e.g. 3mbit on my downstream is about 3-4% of my max speed. It prevents packetloss and makes latency a fraction of what it would be if left alone.

For upstream 2mbit is 10%, but the effect is bigger, as upstream left alone will make latency skyrocket.

But then again I am not downloading 24/7 so I guess it isnt everything for me.

Sky Fibre Pro BQM - IPv4
Standard User Oliver341
(eat-sleep-adslguide) Sun 26-Jul-15 22:28:41
Print Post

Re: Turned on per user display now


[re: deleted] [link to this post]
 
In reply to a post by arobertson545:
I'm just curious how much bandwith people here are losing with the methods to control Bufferbloat?

Since it's mainly an upstream issue, and since people rarely continuously max out their upstream for long periods of time, it's not really a huge issue.

Oliver.
Pages in this thread: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | [6] | (show all)   Print Thread

Jump to