definitely, 1gbps is rather of the scale and would never use it. It is compelling though.
Agreed.
We are down for FTTP which is still down to go live the end of July according to the emails from BTOR so about 8 days to go.
We are going with the full 330/30 due all 5 of us here all use the internet, whether its downloading a 50GB game, updates to several Windows, Mac or Linux boxes along with uploading media content online, watching Netflix, Amazon Prime, Sky On demand etc, our current 5Mbps just cannot cut it LOL.
The way I see it, to get the best speed for the buck it would be the 330/30 with BT (I think option 5, not checked recently), granted after the first year if 330/30 isn't being used as much we may drop down to a speed that ideally fits our needs.
It would be nice to be able to download 50GB in around 22m instead of around 22h 13m on our current 5Mbps connection.
Also I am a software/game developer which sometimes need to upload huge created data files and our 0.8Mbps upload speed just doesn't cut it either, granted FTTC speeds would of been great but with FTTP the 30Mbps upload speeds means it would either be done faster or been able to slow it down a little so not to take up the full upstream.
I have been reading up on G.FAST and wasn't fully sure if that was really for the FTTC upgrade to the pole, or if it would also be available for FTTP users, granted the combined 1Gbps would be nice.
TBH I think that is at the moment 1Gbps a bit of an over kill, not saying it would be fine in the future, but what I liked if I read it correctly was the feature to be able to customize your up and down stream on the fly so if you picked say a combined bandwidth of 400Mbps you could have it as 300Mbps down and 100Mbps up, so downloading would be still great for downloading content etc as well as being able to upload content rather fast as well.
But I have most probably misread stuff, but it still would of been nice though
Paul