General Discussion
  >> General Broadband Chatter


Register (or login) on our website and you will not see this ad.


Pages in this thread: 1 | 2 | [3] | (show all)   Print Thread
Standard User deleted
(deleted) Fri 16-Oct-15 09:02:22
Print Post

Re: New pole required


[re: RobertoS] [link to this post]
 
Will do! Might be back for some advise should things not move on in the next few weeks. As I said it's the telephone that's really important now.
Standard User deleted
(deleted) Sun 18-Oct-15 07:52:29
Print Post

Re: New pole required


[re: RobertoS] [link to this post]
 
Good news! They're online and everything is working okay. More BT engineers showed up Friday and got them connected up with the existing pole. Still don't see why that couldn't happen Wednesdsy but never mind.

Not sure what speeds are like but apparently it's better then they expected and surfing, email and FaceTime is not an issue.
Standard User RobertoS
(elder) Sun 18-Oct-15 10:13:46
Print Post

Re: New pole required


[re: deleted] [link to this post]
 
Great.

The indispensable man or woman passes from the scene, and what happens next is more or less the same thing as was happening before.
My broadband basic info/help site - www.robertos.me.uk. Domains, site and mail hosting - Tsohost.
Connection - AAISP Home::1 80/20. Sync 59999/14372kbps @ 600m. - BQM


Register (or login) on our website and you will not see this ad.

Standard User deleted
(deleted) Sun 18-Oct-15 12:25:58
Print Post

Re: New pole required


[re: deleted] [link to this post]
 
Is it possible there was some mangled communication and some other work regarding the pole was required but not a new one?
Standard User keith969
(member) Sun 18-Oct-15 14:09:51
Print Post

Re: New pole required


[re: deleted] [link to this post]
 
Sounds good. Is that with dialup or ADSL?
Standard User jchamier
(eat-sleep-adslguide) Sun 18-Oct-15 16:25:08
Print Post

Re: New pole required


[re: keith969] [link to this post]
 
In reply to a post by keith969:
Vodaphone and O2 are better as they operate in the 900MHz band which has further coverage than higher frequency operators.

A little simplistic, but one reason why EE (orange/t-mobile) had double the masts to O2 or Vodafone.

The 4G rollout has changed everything for all four networks (EE, Three, Vodafone and O2) - the old rules no longer apply. 4G also travels further than 3G. (simplistic).

plusnet unlimited fibre 80/20 - Since 2 Jun 14 - Aug 15 Sync: 56575/9911 - G.INP download only frown
16 years UK broadband (Since 1999 ntl:cable trial), Asus RT-AC68U & HG612 - BQM - Flash Speedtest - HTML Speedtest
Standard User deleted
(deleted) Mon 19-Oct-15 11:07:31
Print Post

Re: New pole required


[re: keith969] [link to this post]
 
ADSL, Sky Connect
Standard User keith969
(member) Mon 19-Oct-15 12:49:42
Print Post

Re: New pole required


[re: jchamier] [link to this post]
 
In reply to a post by jchamier:
A little simplistic, but one reason why EE (orange/t-mobile) had double the masts to O2 or Vodafone.

The 4G rollout has changed everything for all four networks (EE, Three, Vodafone and O2) - the old rules no longer apply. 4G also travels further than 3G. (simplistic).


Well here in rural Oxfordshire, there's no 4G in our village. I can only get a signal on O2 or Vodaphone, despite being 1Km away from the nearest mast, sometimes not even on 3G.

It's a basic fact that higher frequencies suffer higher atenuation, at least in the GHz range. Just for example, take a wifi router that operates with 2.4GHz and 5GHz. You will find the range of the 5GHz signal much lower than the 2.4GHz one.
Standard User deleted
(deleted) Sat 26-Mar-16 05:56:11
Print Post

Re: New pole required


[re: deleted] [link to this post]
 
Old post I know but I'm visiting this weekend and have been able to test their speeds.

2.88mb at best for the download, was surprised.

http://www.speedtest.net/my-result/i/1593306745

http://www.thinkbroadband.com/speedtest/results.html...
Pages in this thread: 1 | 2 | [3] | (show all)   Print Thread

Jump to