Post deleted by MrSaffron

Until the goverment make them ineffective - better to use IPTV and then all they can see is connection to an unknown server. OR use ethernet and then they can't sniff [censored].

In reply to a post by 23Prince:

Until the goverment make them ineffective - better to use IPTV and then all they can see is connection to an unknown server. OR use ethernet and then they can't sniff [censored].

They ain't going to be even packet sniffing ,

In reply to a post by tommy45:

In reply to a post by 23Prince:

Until the goverment make them ineffective - better to use IPTV and then all they can see is connection to an unknown server. OR use ethernet and then they can't sniff [censored].

They ain't going to be even packet sniffing ,

Just noticed Alexey's post is spam - resurrected an old thread just to advertise a VPN service. The thread itself had died 4 months ago.

In reply to a post by Michael_Chare:

How is this done?

It isn't done, they lie to try to frighten people, detector vans are the same thing.

http://www.bbctvlicence.com/Detector%20vans.htm

Old post that has only risen to the top due to spam. See the rest of the thread as it was already discussed at length.

In reply to a post by ian72:

Just noticed Alexey's post is spam - resurrected an old thread just to advertise a VPN service. The thread itself had died 4 months ago.

I got it confused with a licence conversation me and Tommy were having, Elsewhere it seems - oops!

I hadn't noticed it myself until I saw the previous post was from August - resurrecting old threads generally identifies a spammer - and the link to the VPN service confirms it. I have reported it as spam and suspect it will say bye-bye before very long.

EDIT : 31 seconds from my posting this - MrS is like the Flash

Edited by ian72 (Fri 16-Dec-16 14:03:52)

Spam be gone.