That's basically what all of us have been trying to get across to the OP. That clause satisfies the Ofcom requirement and clears TT.
It also in this case negates my post that you replied to. Mine basically covers the case that TT did not offer the 30-day penalty-free exit.
From what the OP says, I am sure he did receive the same email, and somehow converted it in his mind to "I agreed the contract; yes, I did - but only because TT broke my existing contract by drastically increasing the monthly price I'd agreed with them and insisting that I take up their new 'offer' in February 2021".
I don't see any forcing there, and it's hard to see how any subsequent telephone conversation at the time with the help line could have done so either.
Having said that, it was also a bit of a hard decision for them, as most migrations at that point would have meant signing up for a similar contract. Though there are a few monthly ones around.
Half way through that paragraph I thought of checking if there hade been anything about this at the time, and it turns out there has been. Though with slightly different "facts". No mention of fixed price for the term, though we can assume the email he received was identical to yours.
I also note the "February" in this thread conflicts with that other opening post, dated 11 March, where we have "Today they emailed me to tell me the monthly price is rising by 10%.
I note the OP did not respond to any replies, with any further information.
A person who in court would possibly be classified as "not a reliable witness".
Connections: OnePlus 8 Pro, 4G max 165Mbps down, 24Mbps up on Three Mobile, and B311 4G router, tbb tests normally 35-45Mpbs down, 65Mbps off-peak, 9-24 up.



Pages in this thread:
Print Thread

