General Discussion
  >> General Broadband Chatter


Register (or login) on our website and you will not see this ad.


Pages in this thread: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | [7] | 8 | 9 | (show all)   Print Thread
Standard User Tacitus
(experienced) Sun 19-Sep-21 18:03:55
Print Post

Re: Disappointing Broadband ( in the UK? )


[re: pluralist] [link to this post]
 
In reply to a post by pluralist:
AIUI BT were intending to go full fibre until Thatcher kiboshed it.
I believe they had a couple of factories set up in the UK to manufacture the fibre. Once Thatcher killed it, the factories were sold to the Japanese......
Standard User deleted
(deleted) Sun 19-Sep-21 18:27:44
Print Post

Re: Disappointing Broadband ( in the UK? )


[re: Grimers] [link to this post]
 
In reply to a post by Grimers:
I admit I'm a bit biased.
I need say no more smile
Standard User MHC
(sensei) Sun 19-Sep-21 19:02:47
Print Post

Re: Disappointing Broadband ( in the UK? )


[re: pluralist] [link to this post]
 
In around 84-86 ish, I was working alongside a team doing coax based developments for voice and tv distribution. They were working with BT. The BT fibre work came about after that maybe around 89-91 ish.


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

M H C


taurus excreta cerebrum vincit


Register (or login) on our website and you will not see this ad.

Standard User pluralist
(experienced) Sun 19-Sep-21 19:39:14
Print Post

Re: Disappointing Broadband ( in the UK? )


[re: Tacitus] [link to this post]
 
All, and more, covered in my link and quote here wink.

Connections: OnePlus 8 Pro, 4G+ (LTE) max 165Mbps down, 24Mbps up on Three Mobile, and B311 4G+ router, tbb tests normally 35-45Mpbs down, 65Mbps off-peak, 9-24 up (Three)ZTE MF286D router speedtest.net 113/20Mbps.
===========================================================================
The price of liberty, and even of common humanity, is eternal vigilance. (Aldous Huxley version of the well-known saying)
When you meet Mr Juncker, you realise you haven't got a drink problem. Nigel Farage, 12 Aug 2021
Standard User Jack_Hackett
(knowledge is power) Sun 19-Sep-21 19:41:28
Print Post

Re: Disappointing Broadband ( in the UK? )


[re: andynormancx] [link to this post]
 
In reply to a post by andynormancx:
You can't determine the typical reliability of FTTC by looking at a single line for a year !


Well i visit this forum and Kitz every day and and i can honestly say i don't remember a thread about FTTC unreliability and if there are one or two i missed it certainly is not something posted regularly.
Standard User Fastman3
(committed) Mon 20-Sep-21 07:47:32
Print Post

Re: Disappointing Broadband ( in the UK? )


[re: lockyatlrg] [link to this post]
 
really massive disinformaiton as ever
Standard User Fastman3
(committed) Mon 20-Sep-21 07:51:20
Print Post

Re: Disappointing Broadband ( in the UK? )


[re: kitcat] [link to this post]
 
kitkat

retro new sites are nothing to do with the sites from 1990s they are liike to be copper new sites built with new PCPS prior to 2015 before FTTP was default for new sites (so these will be bulds (when registered with Openreach and offered) around 2011 - 2017
Standard User kitcat
(experienced) Mon 20-Sep-21 14:48:40
Print Post

Re: Disappointing Broadband ( in the UK? )


[re: Fastman3] [link to this post]
 
Fastman

From latest news article

147,760 premises in properties constructed between 1996 and 2005, increase of 9,163 premises
Standard User adslmax
(eat-sleep-adslguide) Mon 20-Sep-21 20:43:36
Print Post

Re: Disappointing Broadband ( in the UK? )


[re: deleted] [link to this post]
 
In reply to a post by dect:
FTTC is fit for purpose and millions of UK homes are happily using it, to say 'people should be on FTTP' is pushing it not by a little but a lot.


FTTP can be used for 40/10, 80/20, 160/30, 330/50, 500/70, 900/110 I think the choice and price down to customer choice.
Standard User j0hn83
(knowledge is power) Tue 21-Sep-21 03:13:52
Print Post

Re: Disappointing Broadband ( in the UK? )


[re: Fastman3] [link to this post]
 
In reply to a post by Fastman3:
kitkat

retro new sites are nothing to do with the sites from 1990s they are liike to be copper new sites built with new PCPS prior to 2015 before FTTP was default for new sites (so these will be bulds (when registered with Openreach and offered) around 2011 - 2017


You couldn't be more wrong.

I've seen OpenReach RNS (Retro New Sites) work go back to properties from 1986.
Thousands and thousands of properties from the 90's fall under RNS.

Basically anything fully ducted in the last 40 years could qualify for RNS.
Pages in this thread: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | [7] | 8 | 9 | (show all)   Print Thread

Jump to