Again thanks to all who have contributed. Looking at BQM's other have posted, and the comments this is the conclusion I come to:
1) My own and the other Entanet-carried BQMs posted here show a spiking latency profile that's consistent with business traffic, with a 9am start and winding down in late afternoon, although individual days vary, some are very good days, others are not very good at all. Sometimes the issue persists into the evening, that seem to be when there's multiple streamed sports matches or big game releases.
2) Comparing MrClump's BQM with my own for the same date, the latency spiking is different and worse for me on those days - suggesting something to do with Entanet traffic that is consistent in principle, but varies by region. This supports the "running hot" opinion, and would explain why it looks like VM's network when they run out of local capacity - in principle the same thing that data is being queued at some point, although in VM's case it's usually very localised at the CMTS.
3) Do I notice any effect? Well yes, that's why I set up the BQM. Logically the up to 120ms spikes are not perceivable, but experience with VM and on this connection means I see the effects of them - game glitches, teleporting, being shot by players I can't see or missing my own shots. The experience at the moment, both in use and on BQM is quite like using VM before they patched the Puma chipset fault. With work video calls, again it's the effect of out of sequence packets that create glitches that the software struggles with. In neither case is it disastrously bad, but it's below my expectations for a new FTTP connection.
4) So I think it seems this is outside of Aquiss control, it's almost certainly attributable to Entanet. I'd guess that the problem arose when Entanet had an MBO in 2014, at which point caning the assets was necessary to cover the financing and get the business into shape for a subsequent trade sale. And whilst CityFibre (who bought Entanet in 2017) might have higher aspirations, they're subject to the wider pressures on the altnet sector so perhaps aren't motivated to fix this minor issue - if a minor degradation is not causing problems for most users, but gets you 3% more sales, what would any of us do?
5) So, what next for me? I don't know. One thing that's certain, and that is that if I do conclude that I want to change ISP it won't be back to any large ISP. The latency issue is not a huge thing and I'm pretty sure the overwhelming majority of customers do not notice any problem. I'd happily recommend Aquiss to others, unless I thought those others were as pernickety as I am.
Andrew



Pages in this thread:
Print Thread

aquiss